September 8, 2009 12:20 PM
- Text
Europeans Angered by Congress' $10 Visa-Waiver Fee
(MoneyWatch) Is it a "tempest in a teapot?"
Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) is one of the sponsors of the Travel Promotion Act, a bill that would require foreign visitors who qualify for visa-free travel to register online and renew that registration once every two years. If the proposal is passed by Congress, all visitors would have to pay a $10 fee when they register. According to Delahunt, the money raised would be used to promote travel and educating foreign visitors on the online registration process.
So far, the bill has been created waves overseas and European Commission's ambassador to Washington, John Bruton said, ""Only in `Alice in Wonderland' could a penalty be seen as promoting the activity on which it is imposed." Bruton also suggested there could be similar fees for U.S. travelers.
Delahunt reportedly called it a "tempest in a teapot."
I guess my concern is that the $10 fee is about promoting U.S. travel, but will be primarily promoting the new online registration process. I'm questioning its existence -- aside from annoying visitors and raising money for something that shouldn't need an advertising budget -- why is it necessary?
It reminds me of the quote, "The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy."
Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) is one of the sponsors of the Travel Promotion Act, a bill that would require foreign visitors who qualify for visa-free travel to register online and renew that registration once every two years. If the proposal is passed by Congress, all visitors would have to pay a $10 fee when they register. According to Delahunt, the money raised would be used to promote travel and educating foreign visitors on the online registration process.
So far, the bill has been created waves overseas and European Commission's ambassador to Washington, John Bruton said, ""Only in `Alice in Wonderland' could a penalty be seen as promoting the activity on which it is imposed." Bruton also suggested there could be similar fees for U.S. travelers.
Delahunt reportedly called it a "tempest in a teapot."
I guess my concern is that the $10 fee is about promoting U.S. travel, but will be primarily promoting the new online registration process. I'm questioning its existence -- aside from annoying visitors and raising money for something that shouldn't need an advertising budget -- why is it necessary?
It reminds me of the quote, "The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Rag & Bone show: From Brit roots to Asia
- Rag & Bone show: From Brit roots to Asia
- Nicole Miller mixes '70s rocker and digital prints
- Nicole Miller mixes '70s rocker and digital prints
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






