February 19, 2009 12:58 PM
- Text
$1.3 Billion to Amtrak, So Why the Discount?
(MoneyWatch)
It's nice to see tax money spent on a service that you may use, and I'm sure that's how people who use Acela Express felt this week. Because at the same time it was reported that Amtrak, which runs Acela Express, was getting $1.3 billion from the new economic stimulus package signed into effect Wednesday -- Amtrak cut Acela fares up to 25 percent.
Sure, Acela serves the East Coast, most notably Washington, D.C. and the very politicos who helped make the stimulus bill happen. Coincidence? Perhaps, but it may start some people thinking, "Where's our discount?"
There's some more method to Amtrak's madness. It turns out that Acela is one of the few Amtrak routes that lost passengers last year. Ridership is down 14 percent from January 2008. And the discount is being used to goose numbers. Meanwhile, almost everywhere else is showing record numbers of passengers -- without a discount.
It's a standard business practice to lower prices on less attractive items. But when taxpayers are footing the bill, shouldn't they all see some benefit or none at all?
Image courtesy of Amtrak
It's nice to see tax money spent on a service that you may use, and I'm sure that's how people who use Acela Express felt this week. Because at the same time it was reported that Amtrak, which runs Acela Express, was getting $1.3 billion from the new economic stimulus package signed into effect Wednesday -- Amtrak cut Acela fares up to 25 percent.Sure, Acela serves the East Coast, most notably Washington, D.C. and the very politicos who helped make the stimulus bill happen. Coincidence? Perhaps, but it may start some people thinking, "Where's our discount?"
There's some more method to Amtrak's madness. It turns out that Acela is one of the few Amtrak routes that lost passengers last year. Ridership is down 14 percent from January 2008. And the discount is being used to goose numbers. Meanwhile, almost everywhere else is showing record numbers of passengers -- without a discount.
It's a standard business practice to lower prices on less attractive items. But when taxpayers are footing the bill, shouldn't they all see some benefit or none at all?
Image courtesy of Amtrak
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Clooney, Pitt, Streep due at British film awards
- Arab League considers revival of Syrian mission
- Iraq opens new oil export terminal in Persian Gulf
- Al-Qaida chief urges outside help for Syria rebels
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Remembering Whitney Houston 1963-2012
on CBS News






