June 8, 2009 10:54 PM
- Text
Health Care Reform Taking a Turn for the Worse
(MoneyWatch) After reading the latest developments on health care reform, I'm increasingly worried about the outcome. In my last blog, I mentioned there was a possibility that those of us with health insurance could end up spending more for our coverage. Now that scenario looks even more likely.
Despite campaigning against it, President Barack Obama is now considering taking away at least part of the tax break extended to those with employer-sponsored health insurance. (This was originally an idea put forward my Senator John McCain during the presidential campaign.) What does this mean for you? Right now, those with employer-sponsored insurance get to use pretax dollars to pay their premiums. However, if you and the company you work for are forced to use post-tax money to pay for insurance premiums, your out-of-pocket expenses will increase significantly.
As a possible compromise, there's talk that workers (and employers) could still use pretax dollars to pay for a portion of premiums -- say $11,000 -- and use post-tax money on expenses above that amount. While this may sound like good news, it could actually set off some terrible and unintended consequences. According to MSNBC.com, Elise Gould, an economist at think-tank Economic Policy Institute, says taxation above a certain dollar level may cause employers to cut back on the health benefits they offer their employees.
"Employers will respond by reducing the comprehensiveness of benefits," Gould says. "They'll likely target premiums to fall below the (threshold) value or just at that value, so employees don't have to pay those additional taxes."
If most of our insurance plans were cut back and covered fewer procedures and illnesses, workers, once again, would get stuck spending more on out-of-pocket expenses.
I'm also very concerned that The Washington Post reports a health care reform bill is expected to hit President Obama's desk by October. That may seem a long way off, but seems awfully quick for members of Congress and the American people to get up to speed on the entire current health care system, which can even confuse the savviest health care professionals, and be able to judge if any of the proposals make sense. Under such a tight deadline, and a summer recess to boot, I fear there will be little time for debate and members of Congress will simply vote down party lines without doing the math and trying to figure out how much each proposal will cost the typical health care consumer. Should that happen, I predict the average family will get stuck paying a much higher price for basic health care services for years to come.
I'm not against the idea of health care reform. I think our system is broken and we need to fix it. I just don't see how that can be done by October. I would rather see our government make incremental changes over the next four years and really take the time to analyze if each new program or law is helping or hurting the system. Here are a few ideas that I believe would help millions of uninsured get coverage:
Money, money, money image by borman818, CC 2.0.
Despite campaigning against it, President Barack Obama is now considering taking away at least part of the tax break extended to those with employer-sponsored health insurance. (This was originally an idea put forward my Senator John McCain during the presidential campaign.) What does this mean for you? Right now, those with employer-sponsored insurance get to use pretax dollars to pay their premiums. However, if you and the company you work for are forced to use post-tax money to pay for insurance premiums, your out-of-pocket expenses will increase significantly.As a possible compromise, there's talk that workers (and employers) could still use pretax dollars to pay for a portion of premiums -- say $11,000 -- and use post-tax money on expenses above that amount. While this may sound like good news, it could actually set off some terrible and unintended consequences. According to MSNBC.com, Elise Gould, an economist at think-tank Economic Policy Institute, says taxation above a certain dollar level may cause employers to cut back on the health benefits they offer their employees.
"Employers will respond by reducing the comprehensiveness of benefits," Gould says. "They'll likely target premiums to fall below the (threshold) value or just at that value, so employees don't have to pay those additional taxes."
If most of our insurance plans were cut back and covered fewer procedures and illnesses, workers, once again, would get stuck spending more on out-of-pocket expenses.
I'm also very concerned that The Washington Post reports a health care reform bill is expected to hit President Obama's desk by October. That may seem a long way off, but seems awfully quick for members of Congress and the American people to get up to speed on the entire current health care system, which can even confuse the savviest health care professionals, and be able to judge if any of the proposals make sense. Under such a tight deadline, and a summer recess to boot, I fear there will be little time for debate and members of Congress will simply vote down party lines without doing the math and trying to figure out how much each proposal will cost the typical health care consumer. Should that happen, I predict the average family will get stuck paying a much higher price for basic health care services for years to come.
I'm not against the idea of health care reform. I think our system is broken and we need to fix it. I just don't see how that can be done by October. I would rather see our government make incremental changes over the next four years and really take the time to analyze if each new program or law is helping or hurting the system. Here are a few ideas that I believe would help millions of uninsured get coverage:
- First, give the uninsured and self employed access to a "group rate" on health insurance through state sponsored plans. Individual states wouldn't need to subsidize these plans. But if they would simply negotiate a fair deal for their "members", individuals wouldn't end up paying more than the rest of us with employer-sponsored coverage.
- Second, don't tax those with employer-sponsored health insurance. Instead, extend the current tax break to everyone so that all taxpayers can use pretax money to pay for health insurance premiums.
- Finally, why limit COBRA (the ability to keep one's insurance for 18 months after leaving a job) just to those who work for large companies? This benefit should be extended to everyone.
Money, money, money image by borman818, CC 2.0.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- GreenCloud saves paper, toner, money and time
- Obama plan for manufacturing revival a tough sell
- Leadership lessons from Alaska Airlines
- Foreclosure pact: Enough help for homeowners?
- EU: Greece must cut deeper to get bailout
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Firefighters spray premier's office
- GreenCloud saves paper, toner, money and time
on Facebook
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- "Person to Person" with George Clooney
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
on CBS News






