July 30, 2009 3:49 PM
- Text
Housing Prices Bottom, But Not for Everyone
(MoneyWatch) In the depressed world of American real estate prices, "down 17.1 percent from a year ago" is good news. That's how much the May S&P/Case-Shiller numbers, an index of housing prices in twenty major cities across the U.S., had declined when they came out yesterday. Yet today's headlines, you'll see, are all about "a housing recovery." That's in part because of the 20 cities covered, prices rose in 14 of them. It's worth noting that Jim Cramer, who I often love to kick around, called this one.
This is great news for the economy. However, I'm feeling like a Debbie Downer today. So let me point out that if you're a professional with a robust (at least by relative standards) income, it doesn't help you a whole lot. That's because the recovery that the stats are showing seems to be in the lower end of the market. Case-Shiller is an index, so it doesn't have median prices, but let's take San Francisco as an example. The median price in the East Bay/San Francisco area was $402,000 in the first quarter of this year, down from $701,700 the year before, according to National Association of Realtors numbers reported by our S.F. real estate blogger pal The Front Steps. It isn't that prices plunged, though they did drop. It's that the mix changed. The real estate sales that are happening are mostly at the low end of the market.
My colleague Ilyce Glink has made the persuasive argument that recent housing numbers show the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit is working. Sure, it's helping, but that credit phases out at $75,000 per individual and $150,000 per couple, which means if you're a dual-income couple living and work in an urban area, you're probably too "rich" to take advantage of it. Oh, and did I mention that this quoted Case-Shiller index doesn't include condos or co-ops? So for a place like Manhattan, where I live and work, it's pretty much useless.
What drives the housing markets on the "higher" end -- say in my city, where three-bedroom condos go for between $2 million and $3 million -- is mortgage money, and above the current conforming loan limit of $729,750, there's very little. In fact, I think it's been a year since I saw a transaction with a mortgage of more than a million dollars. The volume of sales has slowed to such a trickle that it's tough to even know how to price things in the upper echelon. But I think it's safe to say -- at least in the niche of coveted, big-city, short-commute-to-work apartments -- that credit is still crunched, and so we haven't seen our "recovery" yet.
Read More:
This is great news for the economy. However, I'm feeling like a Debbie Downer today. So let me point out that if you're a professional with a robust (at least by relative standards) income, it doesn't help you a whole lot. That's because the recovery that the stats are showing seems to be in the lower end of the market. Case-Shiller is an index, so it doesn't have median prices, but let's take San Francisco as an example. The median price in the East Bay/San Francisco area was $402,000 in the first quarter of this year, down from $701,700 the year before, according to National Association of Realtors numbers reported by our S.F. real estate blogger pal The Front Steps. It isn't that prices plunged, though they did drop. It's that the mix changed. The real estate sales that are happening are mostly at the low end of the market.
My colleague Ilyce Glink has made the persuasive argument that recent housing numbers show the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit is working. Sure, it's helping, but that credit phases out at $75,000 per individual and $150,000 per couple, which means if you're a dual-income couple living and work in an urban area, you're probably too "rich" to take advantage of it. Oh, and did I mention that this quoted Case-Shiller index doesn't include condos or co-ops? So for a place like Manhattan, where I live and work, it's pretty much useless.
What drives the housing markets on the "higher" end -- say in my city, where three-bedroom condos go for between $2 million and $3 million -- is mortgage money, and above the current conforming loan limit of $729,750, there's very little. In fact, I think it's been a year since I saw a transaction with a mortgage of more than a million dollars. The volume of sales has slowed to such a trickle that it's tough to even know how to price things in the upper echelon. But I think it's safe to say -- at least in the niche of coveted, big-city, short-commute-to-work apartments -- that credit is still crunched, and so we haven't seen our "recovery" yet.
Read More:
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
- Officials: Gaza man killed in Israeli airstrike
- Gunmen kill provincial judge, child in Afghanistan
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- "Phantom" star sings on "CBS This Morning: Saturday"
on CBS News






