prev
next
Newtown shooting jolts firearms industry
Written by Chuck Wilbanks
(MoneyWatch) With the decision to sell the Freedom Group, whose subsidiary Bushmaster Firearms made the military-style weapon used in last week's massacre in Newtown, Conn., private equity group Cerberus is bowing to the intense anti-gun sentiment racing through the country. On another level, the move amounts to a cut-your-losses business decision that may say little about the future of the gun industry.
Given the intense public scrutiny on the firearms business following the December 14 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, selling Freedom Group could prove difficult for Cerberus. Along with a possible backlash against gun manufacturers that could deter potential buyers, a move by Congress to re-institute a ban on semi-automatic rifles of the kind used in the attack and numerous other mass shootings in recent years could bite into gun makers' sales, lowering Freedom Group's value.
The business of guns: Wall street and the gun economy
But for Cerberus, which entered the arms business six years ago with high ambitions, shedding its gun assets even at a loss would be less costly than losing business from deep-pocketed institutional investors. The California Teachers' Retirement System said Tuesday that it would review its roughly $750 million investment with Cerberus. The pension fund noted in a statement that "current policies require that the risks associated with products that pose significant threats to human well-being be taken into account before an investment is made by CalSTRS investment managers."
Through September, Freedom Group reported profits of $118 million, before taxes, interest and other costs, on net sales of $677 million. To put that in perspective, Cerberus has about $20 billion from all its investors that it can in turn use to make acquisitions such as the spree that created Freedom Group. With the prospect of major clients threatening to walk, the rewards may not have seemed great enough.
Newtown: Funerals for victims continue
Cerberus, named after the three-headed mythological dog that guards the gates of the underworld, bought Bushmaster in 2006 -- four years after one of the company's rifles was used in the Washington Beltway sniper killings -- and then began what's known in the merger and acquisition trade as a "roll-up."
The firm also bought Remington, a storied maker of hunting rifles and shotguns, as well as military style semi-automatic handguns whose design dates back to the first world war; Dakota Arms, a maker of high-end rifles designed for hunting anything from gophers to elephants; The Harrington & Richardson company, which offers affordable shotguns and rifles designed for deer hunting; Parker Shotguns, immaculately engraved and extremely expensive shotguns; DPMS Panther Arms, which, like Bushmaster, manufactures military style rifles; TAPCO, which makes various accessories for such guns; and Advanced Armament Corp., which makes silencers. Freedom also has units that contract to government, such as Remington Military and Remington LE (Law Enforcement).
Newtown shooting first responder: It was chaos
As with other such buyouts, the plan was for Cerberus to realize a profit by selling Freedom Group or by taking it public. In 2009, the firm filed with the SEC for permission to sell shares of Freedom in an initial public offering, only to withdraw the filing two years later.
It's not only Cerberus that is under pressure, with other gun sellers also now in the spotlight. In addition to the comments by CalSTRS, California Treasurer Bill Lockyer said Tuesday he is considering ordering that fund and its sibling, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, or CalPERS, to divest themselves from any investment in firearms manufacturers.
Meanwhile, although President Barack Obama did nothing to promote gun control during his first term despite a series of horrific massacres, gun company share prices climbed anyway, fed in part by fears promoted by the National Rifle Association and other groups that gun control or even gun seizures were around the corner.
Lawmakers lead the way to ban assault weapons, large magazines
Stock prices haven't reacted that way this time. New government curbs on assault rifles are expected, and retailers such as Wal-Mart (WMT) and Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) aren't waiting for federal action -- they're already pulling some semi-automatic rifles from the shelves.
Shares of Smith & Wesson (SWHC), once known for well-made double-action revolvers but now heavily into the military-style rifle and handgun sector, lost 4 percent the day of the Sandy Hook shootings and lost another 10 percent Tuesday. Sturm Ruger (RGR), an old Connecticut manufacturer that has similarly veered into the tactical market, has taken a similar shellacking. Opinion polls also show strong public support for banning these guns.
"In almost every other developed country, people ask what can we do to make sure such shootings never happen again," said David Hemenway, a professor of health policy at Harvard University and an expert on firearms policy. "We're unique in that we don't have sensible gun control laws."
Victims of Conn. school shooting
Led by Stephen Feinberg, who has a home in Connecticut as well as Manhattan (his father lives in a retirement community in Newtown), Cerberus may be best known for its failed journey into automaking. It bought Chrysler in 2007 for $7.4 billion, put it in the hands of former Home Depot (HD) CEO Robert Nardelli and sent it into bankruptcy two years later.
An ill-advised bet on the home mortgage business through another $7.4 billion deal, a 2006 deal to join other investors in purchasing GMAC, was another debacle. In that case, Feinberg chose Ezra Merkin, a former confederate of Bernard Madoff who had steered hundreds of millions of dollars to Madoff's funds. Cerberus had to seek a government bailout in 2008, prompting investors to reclaim more than $4.7 billion from the firm's funds.
- Watch: Vicki Soto's family on Obama: Told us she's a hero
- NRA promises "meaningful contribution" to avert another Newtown
- CBSNews.com's full coverage of the Newtown shooting
Cerberus did not return a call seeking comment on its decision to sell Freedom Group.
In a statement announcing that it would seek to sell its gun assets, Cerberus expressed sadness over the Newtown shooting and said that "no words or actions can lessen the enormity of this event or make a dent in the pain that was inflicted on so many."
Yet if it succeeds in selling the gun conglomerate it assembled, the new owner would likely take up where Cerberus left off, marketing military-style weapons as sporting weapons.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- How to stop the mediocrity pandemic
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Powerball: What to do if you won
- Fired for violating an unwritten policy
- Facebook's first year on Wall Street 5 Photos
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
The second amendement sounds just as bad as the nuclear deterent concept. The more weapons the more safe you will feel? Sounds like a bunch of paranoid folk. Which I can understand as the founding fathers had just kicked out the british oppresors and later the slave mongering south. And we can't forget the indians too. Thats all old news now, the future looks much brighter than that.
I think USA needs to transcend the past and move onto a more peaceful and less paranoid future. You've got the nukes so you are safe from foreigners. You have a stable democratic political system and a government that will kick your ass wether you have a gun or not.
Luckily we have the 2nd amendment. But they are also trying to destroy that to.
But the arguments most people are using in the defense of the 2nd amendment are also flawed. There is only one argument needed for the 2nd amendment. That is the 2nd amendment it's self.
Our founding fathers saw to it that in order to protect our citizens from a tyrannical government from destroying our rights and liberties they put the 2nd amendment there for the exact reason. that in time of need be it civil unrest. Or to protect our nation from said tyrannical government. That the citizenry has the ability to rise and take arms to protect them selves and their families their homes and communities and even their nation. By forming a well regulated militia and going to its defense. This militia is made up of the citizens of this country. In times past this meant the men and sometimes boys would take up arms and fight. Today it would be all men and woman. all able bodied citizens. This is the meaning of the 2nd amendment.
Not hunting not collecting not target shooting or any other legal pastime we enjoy with them. These pastimes are a fringe benefit of the 2nd amendment not a right from it.
So in order to be able to follow the real meaning of the 2nd amendment. the owning of personal arms by citizens can not be infringed.
Any other argument you use for or against the 2nd amendment is irrelevant. it is the right of the people period.
Now we are talking personal arms be it a knife, sword, spear. Bow, pistol, or rifle. I'm not talking about arms that are indiscriminate. Such as explosives, grenades, rpg's and maybe even full auto machine guns. As these weapons tend to be completely indiscriminate. These weapons do need to be controlled in differing degrees.
The only people who could be and should be bared from this are as follows. convicted criminals who haven't been pardoned or received clemency. individuals who are not of voting age, non us citizens and those who have mental illnesses that make them a danger to them selves and others.
I hope I have stated this clearly and easy to understand. If anyone just does a little research you will see by the writings of our founding fathers that this is what the 2nd amendment is.
But of coarse the anti guns nuts will find all kinds of faults with this because it doesn't fit into their skewed fantasies. But what can you you do.
I have lived nearly 50 years and have studied the constitution most of them. I am not a republican or democrat. There are many thing I do not like about both of these parties. They have both become corrupt self serving groups. Not really interested in doing what is right but in serving their own bull@hit agendas. I am what I call a constitutional conservative. I believe in the constitution not a political party.
Alan J. Pettengill
You can not blame the tools of a killer. Like it or not we all have acts of evil in us, it is just a matter of having a moral compass knowing its wrong and not doing it.
The only difference between a criminal with a gun and a law biding citizen is the day, even law biding citizens can have bad days and kill.
The USA doesn't need gun control we just need to arm everyone (minus Felons) which will it a friendlier place.
So let me pose this, you get your gun control no more semi automatics everyone can own a 6 shooter. so is six bullets more acceptable than 20? Now lets say you have a gun that shoots one bullet, is one bullet more acceptable over 6 or 20? England when they took away handguns from the people the murder rate didnt drop it increased. Just because you take away the guns doesnt mean that people arent going to die from murder. Now what you have done is open the door. You still have Bats rocks bows fuel airbombs (which take all of 15 minutes to make with gasoline) Do you out law all them too? See when you allow the government to alter remove rip away parts of the constitution of the United states you are no longer a free people and you dishonor all those who fought for it. My family was part of the colonies and we have a long history of most of use being in the military or some form of government.
See the bigger picture not a short time fix. A person armed is free a person disarmed is a subject.
My heart goes out to the families of this horrid incident.