Dumb mistakes smart people make on resumes
(MoneyWatch) Finding a job these days is obviously no picnic, so why make it harder than it needs to be? There are a lot of simple,commonsensical things you can do to ensure you're putting your best foot forward when searching for a job.
Recently, former employment recruiter Tisha Tolar rounded up a number of easily correctable mistakes she has seen on resumes in the budgeting blog Wisebread. Here are the highlights:
Spell check. Tolar recounts having seen many a resume that claims the candidate has "great communication skills," yet typos abound. Make sure your resume is squeaky clean -- that means a spelling and grammar check, and have someone else review it to be sure you didn't miss anything. As a hiring manager myself, I can assure you that I've personally passed on resumes with typos. Why should I waste my time with someone who doesn't spell check his or her own resume, with so many outstanding candidates to choose from?
- Your resume: Emphasize how you add value
- 5 reasons you didn't get hired
- 4 ways to make your resume more marketable
Don't stick with a template. There's nothing wrong with building your resume from a template. But if you just fill in the blanks and leave it at that, your resume will look the part. Especially if you're hunting for a more senior position, take the time to personalize your resume. Make sure it captures your career and your capabilities, and dress it up so it doesn't look like every single entry-level resume in HR's stack.
Target yourself. Whenever I have a job opening, I get a slew of applications from people who have absolutely no qualification for the role whatsoever. I have resigned myself to that, and I filter them out quickly (or, if I'm lucky, HR does that for me). But more frustrating are the resumes I get that have potential, but the candidate made no effort to align their generic resume and cover letter with the specific requirements and responsibilities with the job description. If you really want my attention, make it clear how you are a great fit for this specific role.
Photo courtesy of Flickr user Tax Credits
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Chrysler expected to make Jeep recall refusal official
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- 6 ways to pay off your student loans
- Why geniuses don't have jobs
- The Internship: 6 real-life lessons from the movie
- Chrysler agrees to recall of Jeeps at risk of fire
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Lowe's offers to buy Orchard Supply for $205M














While dyslexics make up 3-15% of the population and they only represent < 1% of middle management positions and your statement shows why. You may think that sounds like the impact of the inability to do the job but there are a number of studies showing that they (dyslexics) make up 40-60% of entrepreneurs
( http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.388/abstract )( https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/710).
So If I got a badly spelt resume I would check the errors against the classic symptoms of dyslexia and re-merge into the 'to keep' pile. That is if I wanted to employ someone who was likely to have above average creative skills ( 60+%of top art school students are dyslexics) abilities to innovate and think 'out of the box' and have ability to get a good 'overview' of problems.
For many dyslexics putting dyslexia upfront on their resume is a good way to get a door slammed in their face, so don't expect to see it on the resume in bold. Most potential employers ( and obviously you) don't understand the up and down sides of these kinds of learning difficulties. There are many places where admitting to dyslexia is such a no-no that admitting to it is the kiss of death for their chosen career.
So come on, I would start by asking my self why, in these days of spell checkers and other tools, did someone have enough nerve to send me a badly spelt resume? Perhaps they are a risk taker.
here's a newsflash... for most people looking for a job, it's not some silly game. they have a resume which accurately reflects their work histories, and the idea of manufacturing some document which is more like a creative writing assignment just to 'tailor the resume to the position' is absurd. the fact is that the person is the person. period. they have specific histories. period. more often than not (perhaps most often) if a person is applying for a position, then that person knows he/she IS qualified to do the job, and has a real interest in the position.
if the automaton who works in hr can get by the superficial conclusion that the resume 'doesn't fit' then maybe they would find people who have abilities and qualifications due to their experiences that can work exceptionally well in a new job/field. just because something isn't obvious upon a quick scan of a resume, the person shouldn't be overlooked.
as a former member of the nyse/trader, i speak from experience when i find myself being excluded from consideration just because my experience doesn't directly address a new area i am considering, despite the fact that the attributes i have as a result of my prior career would easily allow me to function well and transition to a variety of new settings.
unfortunately corporate hiring behavior is stuck in this moronic mindset.