Microsoft prevents direct access to Windows 8 desktop

Microsoft
(MoneyWatch) Microsoft (MSFT) has wrapped up another edition of Windows: Windows 8 has been released to manufacturing, which means you'll be able to buy a copy (or get it in a new PC) on October 29. And with the new operating system set to hit stores, interesting facts are starting to leak out.
Like the fact that it's impossible to avoid the "Metro"-style "start" screen.
Metro is Microsoft's codename for the all-new, "modern" interface that borrows heavily from the Windows Phone aesthetic to reinvent Windows as a lighter, simpler, touch-friendly operating system. In Metro, icons are gone. All apps are represented by large tiles, and multitasking takes a back seat to apps that can for the most part only run full screen.
As ZDNet reports, Windows 8 will not allow users to boot directly to the traditional desktop, bypassing the modern start screen. Instead, Windows will always start one way and one way only -- directly to the Metro user interface.
Analysis: Windows 8 marks end of desktop era
Windows 8's secret weapon
Business guide for Windows 8
Microsoft critics are livid, as one might expect. I've read many a criticism about this decision by Redmond, and most of it can be summarized along the lines of "Microsoft has eliminated choice," and "Microsoft has made using Windows harder by adding clicks to getting started."
There's certainly some merit to these arguments. Assuming that you always want to stick with the traditional desktop, and assuming that all the programs you need are pinned to the taskbar or have shortcuts lying on the desktop, there's no reason to start on, well, start.
Those users would benefit from having the ability to make their PC boot directly to the desktop, so they can start working right away. I presume most enterprise and corporate users will fall into this bucket, at least for the first few years, before Metro-style line of business apps are widely developed.
But for everyone else, you need to get to the start screen anyway. Let's be clear: Unless you've pinned your apps somewhere on the desktop, the Metro-style start screen is... the start screen. It's the new--and radically improved--start menu, and it's the way you fire up your apps. It only makes sense to start there.
And if you land on the start screen when you turn on your PC but don't really need to be there, remember that the desktop is a tile, so it's just one click away. Or press Windows+D (the same keyboards shortcut that takes you to the desktop in Windows 7). Either works, and both are the equivalent of a single click.
I'm justifiably dubious about how well Windows 8 is going to do this fall when it hits the streets, but this much is true: If Windows 8 fails, it won't be because Microsoft made you perform an extra click to get to the desktop.
What do you think about this latest kerfuffle over Windows 8? Does it concern you, or is it just a distraction? Sound off with your opinion about Windows 8 in the comments.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Chrysler expected to make Jeep recall refusal official
- 6 ways to pay off your student loans
- Why geniuses don't have jobs
- Chrysler agrees to recall of Jeeps at risk of fire
- The Internship: 6 real-life lessons from the movie
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Chrysler continues its refusal to issue a Jeep recall














For a beginning my plan was/is to upgrade from Windows 7 (which I really like) to Windows 8 but continue to use it as much as possible in desktop mode. I even thought I would find a third party start bar which is one of my favorite things about Windows 7. I would then occasionally switch to the start screen to play with new apps. I figured over time I would use the start screen more and more. But I often have 5 to 10 apps running and have three or four tiled on the screen. I often have a movie running while I'm surfing the web. None of my typical behaviors will be available in the start screen mode.
So in response to the article I'm disappointed that Windows 8 will always start on the start screen instead of the desktop. Yes it is only one click but I'm not happy that I can't make the desktop the default.
As I don't have a touch screen on my desktop I may wait to install Windows 8 for a while because of this forced start screen thing. I'm in no hurry. I'm quite happy with Windows 7.
I have 43 apps pinned to my start page. 25 are visible w/o scrolling and 8 of those display active info like weather, calendar, mail, social updates, headlines etc. 45 apps in the old start list menu is, in my experience, far less efficient at quickly finding apps not pinned to the taskbar. Especially once you memorize tile locations.
I agree with you on the messiness of some apps once installed, that's a problem that needs fixing but unpinning the junk is simple and once it's done, when the Start page is exactly how you want it, it's far more superior than the old menu. IMO experience of course.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/10/11/reflecting-on-your-comments-on-the-start-screen.aspx
No one has yet explained or demonstrated how or why the new start screen offers any improvement over the old start menu, much less a "radical" one, and the reasons it's more cumbersome and less efficient are readily apparent. We keep hearing claims such as the above repeated without any justification whatsoever, as if repeating something that's not true will somehow make it true.
On a touch interface, yes, the start screen is easier to use. On a keyboard/mouse driven system, in most cases it's not. It's just, simply, not, and here's why. As initially configured, the start screen looks very nice - large tiles, many of which display active information. It's a great idea. But how many of the programs you typically install provide any active information that could be displayed in it's application "tile". Very few. And not just because they haven't been "optimized" for Windows 8, but because the application just doesn't have any active information to display. After you install dozens of applications, each of which will create a small tile (what used to be refereed to as an icon) for the application itself, any help files, any uninstall routines, etc. These will all be jumbled up without any organization to the right of Microsoft's default start screen tiles and finding the one you want is much more difficult than using a hierarchically organized menu system.
I'm not saying the start menu didn't have it's own inefficiencies, but none of them have been solved by the start screen and, much to the contrary, many of them have been made worse.