September 1, 2010 12:19 PM
- Text
The Myth of the Walmart Effect
(MoneyWatch)
Everybody knows that when Walmart comes in, local small businesses get wiped out. But as is often the case, everybody is wrong.
Recent research shows that while some small businesses do suffer when the Bentonville behemoth builds nearby, others prosper. And when you dig into it, you find that it may not be Walmart that is hurting small retailers and small communities. It may be that they're hurting themselves, by blindly accepting the what-everybody-knows myth of the Walmart effect.
The research in question appeared in 2009 in Economic Geography, a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal from Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. The three researchers hailed from the University of Florida, the University of Toronto and Princeton University -- all reputable institutions far removed from Bentonville, Arkansas. Before sharing the details of the results, however, let's discuss the weaknesses in the study.
First, it's restricted to Florida, which means that a study done in, say, California, might find something different. The researchers also looked at just four types of businesses -- antique stores, photo retailers, beauty salons and home furnishings -- so another obvious question is what happens to other small retailers. No doubt additional limitations exist and will be highlighted by later researchers who have grants to spend and posses of grad students to keep busy on future studies. One possibility: The study looked at activity from 1980, three years before Wal-Mart appeared in Florida, until 2004, so things may have changed since then.
Having said that, this appears to be a well-done study. The data came from authoritative sources: the state of Florida for small business openings and closings and Wal-Mart, for its store openings. Anticipating your next objection, the authors explicitly deny that Wal-Mart endorsed or influenced the results.
Among the key findings:
Close examinations of business phenomena can be intimidating. They illustrate that our common understandings are often wrong, and that commercial ecologies are often much more complex than they seem. But, hopefully, they will convince you to look more deeply, ask more questions and not too quickly accept what everybody knows.
Image courtesy Flicker user wachovia_138, CC 2.0
Everybody knows that when Walmart comes in, local small businesses get wiped out. But as is often the case, everybody is wrong.Recent research shows that while some small businesses do suffer when the Bentonville behemoth builds nearby, others prosper. And when you dig into it, you find that it may not be Walmart that is hurting small retailers and small communities. It may be that they're hurting themselves, by blindly accepting the what-everybody-knows myth of the Walmart effect.
The research in question appeared in 2009 in Economic Geography, a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal from Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. The three researchers hailed from the University of Florida, the University of Toronto and Princeton University -- all reputable institutions far removed from Bentonville, Arkansas. Before sharing the details of the results, however, let's discuss the weaknesses in the study.
First, it's restricted to Florida, which means that a study done in, say, California, might find something different. The researchers also looked at just four types of businesses -- antique stores, photo retailers, beauty salons and home furnishings -- so another obvious question is what happens to other small retailers. No doubt additional limitations exist and will be highlighted by later researchers who have grants to spend and posses of grad students to keep busy on future studies. One possibility: The study looked at activity from 1980, three years before Wal-Mart appeared in Florida, until 2004, so things may have changed since then.
Having said that, this appears to be a well-done study. The data came from authoritative sources: the state of Florida for small business openings and closings and Wal-Mart, for its store openings. Anticipating your next objection, the authors explicitly deny that Wal-Mart endorsed or influenced the results.
Among the key findings:
- Walmart probably scares away potential entrepreneurs more often than it forces them to shut down. Certainly some stores do close. But the authors say that declines in net numbers of nearby small retailers are better explained by fewer entries than more closings.
- The stores next door don't take the hardest hit when Walmart arrives. Rather, the most-affected are located outside the immediate ZIP code. Shoppers from neighboring areas drive past their local stores and, once they get near Walmart, go into active shopping mode and patronize those nearby.
- Not all nearby stores get flattened by the Bentonville bulldozer. Those selling products and, especially, services that Walmart doesn't will tend to do well. Again, because shoppers arrive near Walmart ready to spend, they tend to leave their money with whomever nearby is selling what they want.
- Retailers that close near Walmarts tend to be selling the same types of items as Walmart. These authors go on to add that the empty storefronts, over time, tend to be filled up again by businesses such as professional firms, boutiques and restaurants that do not duplicate Wal-Mart's offerings. This tends to diversify and enrich local retail markets, while providing new opportunities to entrepreneurs who might not otherwise have had them. They describe this as an example of Schumpeterian "creative destruction," which is generally held to be a good thing.
Close examinations of business phenomena can be intimidating. They illustrate that our common understandings are often wrong, and that commercial ecologies are often much more complex than they seem. But, hopefully, they will convince you to look more deeply, ask more questions and not too quickly accept what everybody knows.
Image courtesy Flicker user wachovia_138, CC 2.0
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Bahrain rights activist says 2 Americans detained
- Lebanese gunmen clash over Syria crisis
- As Syria burns, neighboring Lebanon feels the heat
- Former President Silva hospitalized in Brazil
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






