AP/ March 22, 2013, 6:18 PM

JPMorgan in 2012 paid CEO Jamie Dimon $18.7 million

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon / Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images

NEW YORK The CEO of JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Jamie Dimon, received $18.7 million in compensation last year, according to regulatory documents the country's largest bank filed Friday.

That's 19 percent less than Dimon received in 2011, when his $23 million pay package made him the highest paid bank CEO in the country.

JPMorgan had already said that it would dock Dimon's pay, largely because the bank took a $6 billion loss from a complex derivatives trade that went bad last year.

In January, the bank's board said it would slice Dimon's pay in half, lowering it to $11.5 million. But nearly all of that pay cut came from a reduction in his incentive compensation, which takes three years until it is fully vested.

Earlier this month, a Senate committee issued a scathing report on JPMorgan that spread the blame for the trading loss to the bank's key executives, including Dimon.

Calls from investors for Dimon to give up the job of board chairman have intensified, but the bank defended Dimon's dual role. "The Board has determined that the most effective leadership model for the Firm currently is that Mr. Dimon serves as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer," the board said in a statement.

Dimon, 57, has led the New York bank as president and CEO since Dec. 31, 2005. He was appointed chairman the following year.

His compensation included $1.5 million in salary, stock awards worth $12 million and options of $5 million. His pay package also counts $64,437 for his personal use of aircraft and $68,379 for guarding Dimon's residence.

Unlike previous years, Dimon didn't receive a cash bonus in 2012.

The Associated Press formula calculates an executive's total compensation during the last fiscal year by adding salary, bonuses, perks, above-market interest that the company pays on deferred compensation and the estimated value of stock and stock options awarded during the year. The AP formula does not count changes in the present value of pension benefits. That makes the AP total slightly different in most cases from the total reported by companies to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The value that a company assigned to an executive's stock and option awards for 2012 was the present value of what the company expected the awards to be worth to the executive over time. Companies use one of several formulas to calculate that value. However, the number is just an estimate, and what an executive ultimately receives will depend on the performance of the company's stock in the years after the awards are granted. Most stock compensation programs require an executive to wait a specified amount of time to receive shares or exercise options.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
4 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
[oweghn says:
I don't even have to read the article. I put my 401K into there hands to handle to make me money. The only money in my 401k is the money I put in it. It has been flat line for 8 years. I'll take some of that $18 mil, like 10% for 8 years. Your fired.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SeeBSnews4u says:
Former chief executive and Obama/ Clinton friend Franklin Raines of Fannie Mae received more than $90 million in bonuses and other pay ini 5 yrs as a result of falsely inflated earnings at the US' largest mortgage finance company. We all know how well that went too. Crash. Didn't hear a word about that here did we. Those bad Wall Street Bankers.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You'll enjoy reading this article, no doubt:

http://occupycorporatism.com/obama-omits-disclosure-on-his-two-bank-accounts-at-jpmorgan/

Oh, is that the same Fannie Mae that's related to Freddie Mac where Newt Gingrich also cashed in?

I'm sure you also believe Bernanke and Geithner were close buddies of Obama, who came in after he was elected as well... (both of them are Bush buddies, though there are only 3 reasons why Obama would have kept both of them on...)
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
P.S. Why are you attacking successful people? Rightwingers have asked us lefties quite often why we lambaste successful people. Franklin Raines is successful, so why are you upset? (Do note this is a rhetorical question, I know the response, and am hoping you'll realize it once you say what your response is, assuming you do...)