By

Suzanne Lucas /

MoneyWatch/ January 18, 2013, 8:21 AM

Why your boss may be mad with power

(MoneyWatch) Have you ever known a perfectly nice person who turned into a monster when they got that promotion to manager? Turns out there may be a good explanation for that.

Science Daily cites a new study showing that people with power tend to see things as more black and white, and are therefore willing to enforce harsher punishments. The researchers, Scott Wiltermuth of the USC Marshall School of Business and Francis Flynn of the Stanford Graduate School of Business, set up an experiment where some students were given positions of power and others were not. Those in the "power" positions were far more likely to see things in stark, dualistic terms.

When facing a situation where a mistake had been made, the people in power were quick to attribute it to a clear cause and unlikely to say it depended on other factors. Wiltermuth says:

We found the same phenomenon when we made other people feel powerful, and we also found the resulting clarity led people to punish questionable behavior more severely. That link between power and more severe punishment could cause a huge problem for managers. What a manager sees as appropriate punishment could be seen as absolutely draconian by other people.

Their finding clarifies something I've observed in my own career: I now understand why micro-managers micro-manage. They gain power and suddenly they see things as black or white, right or wrong. And if their way is the right way to do something, by definition all other ways are the wrong way to do it. And since wrong is bad, they must stop their employees from doing bad. And the only way to do this is to make sure everything is done the right way, which must by definition be the way the boss would have done it himself.

I'm not sure if Wiltermuth and Flynn would agree that that is where their study leads, but it's something I've seen in practice. People have a hard time distinguishing between bad and different. They also have difficulty changing their minds, even when additional information is presented. Or they refuse to look at additional information.

For instance, on Wednesday I wrote about a person who was accused of wrongdoing at work while never even being asked to give her side of the story. That looks an awful lot like someone quickly making a decision and refusing to consider that there was more to the story.

Of course, one of the things that is necessary in a leadership role is the ability to make a decision and stick to it. Waffling doesn't get things done. And getting complete information on any decision is nearly impossible. (Tell me, just how do you know that your best option for lunch was that cheeseburger?) Leaders need to make decisions and stick to them.

So it's a balancing act. If you're a manager, this study says you may be prone to make hard-line decisions. My advice is to take that into consideration. Set a goal for yourself that you will consider input from people every day before you act. Be careful in your hiring and surround yourself with good people who can help you make good choices -- and then listen to them.

Most of all, don't let that power go straight to your head.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
  • Suzanne Lucas On Twitter »

    View all articles by Suzanne Lucas on CBS MoneyWatch »
    Suzanne Lucas spent 10 years in corporate Human Resources. She's hired, fired, and analyzed the numbers for several major companies. She founded the Carnival of HR, a bi-weekly gathering of HR blogs, and her writings have been used in HR certification and management training courses across the country.

10 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nastacio says:
The notion of cause and relationship was not fully explored here. The relationship between managers and employees is not formed by randomly picking a person from the group, there is already a strong correlation between the personality and aspirations of the person and the position.

In that sense, I do not dispute that the study surfaced a valid observation, in that the position surfaces certain aspects of one's personality.

The main factor for micro-management, as it is for any kind of deficient execution, comes from lack of experience. I have met many managers in different stages of their careers for several years, the micro-managemnet facet of their style tends to disappear or subside over the years, as they get used to trusting (or needing to trust) other people.

A good boss for the manager in question will also go a long way in coaching the manager about focusing on strategy rather than hands-on execution.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nastacio says:
The notion of cause and relationship was not fully explored here. The relationship between managers and employees is not formed by randomly picking a person from the group, there is already a strong correlation between the personality and aspirations of the person and the position.

In that sense, I do not dispute that the study surfaced a valid observation, in that the position surfaces certain aspects of one's personality.

The main factor for micro-management, as it is for any kind of deficient execution, comes from lack of experience. I have met many managers in different stages of their careers for several years, the micro-managemnet facet of their style tends to disappear or subside over the years, as they get used to trusting (or needing to trust) other people.

A good boss for the manager in question will also go a long way in coaching the manager about focusing on strategy rather than hands-on execution.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
vwelches says:
There was an excellent article published in the Wall Street Journal titled "Let's Get Rid of Management" sometime around 1992, and I would highly recommend this to anyone. This article gave very clear ideas on the differences between "Managers" and "Leaders". I think the conclusion of the article was something like this. "If someone wants to manage anything/anyone, let him/her first manage himself, then maybe he/she will be ready to lead."

My understanding after reading this article is that Managers Manipulate, but, Leaders Motivate.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Habib Navaid says:
Power makes corrupt as well and people use their assessment or judgement as absolutely correct. While when a leader manger is open to surroundings, will get many different ideas helping in finalizing decisions. It is true that a decision is made to implement and people ought to stick to it but if a wrong decision is made due to insufficient info or any other influence, changing it would benefit all. No one should feel bad about it. Leading people is a basket of vision, interpersonal skill set, and a heart which feels keen on achieveing more. it goes without saying that integrity is essential.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Habib Navaid says:
Power makes corrupt as well and people use their assessment or judgement as absolutely correct. While when a leader manger is open to surroundings, will get many different ideas helping in finalizing decisions. It is true that a decision is made to implement and people ought to stick to it but if a wrong decision is made due to insufficient info or any other influence, changing it would benefit all. No one should feel bad about it. Leading people is a basket of vision, interpersonal skill set, and a heart which feels keen on achieveing more. it goes without saying that integrity is essential.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Stephen Isienyi says:
When a person is promoted to a managerial post, s/he is actually required to lead. A typical manager simply supervises which is pathetic.

Why is a manager supposed to lead? A manager manages human beings. Human beings are by definition intelligent beings - so therefore there must be gray areas in the reasons for the things that we do. To be a leader requires the mental capacity to consider all details before making a decision - because s/he must abide by whatever decision s/he makes in the matter. Should s/he be so obstinate to stick to a dumb one, this will reflect poorly on him/her and poorly also on the ones who gave him/her such a position.

Any manager who does not get the point above is not yet ready to lead. Management is not only about hitting individual targets - it is about giving the team the support it needs to be a super successful team. A team consists of people, not machines. So what do you think this requires of a manager? Does it require that s/he lead? Hopefully so.
reply
Habib Navaid replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Power makes corrupt as well and people use their assessment or judgement as absolutely correct. While when a leader manger is open to surroundings, will get many different ideas helping in finalizing decisions. It is true that a decision is made to implement and people ought to stick to it but if a wrong decision is made due to insufficient info or any other influence, changing it would benefit all. No one should feel bad about it. Leading people is a basket of vision, interpersonal skill set, and a heart which feels keen on achieveing more. it goes without saying that integrity is essential.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
anvil78 says:
This article and study not only reinforce what most people are aware of, but it also may provide some insight for more of an ongoing problem with management in general. If those in power who see things as black/white and/or are micro-managers, chances are that if/when given the chance to name their successor, especially if they receive a promotion overseeing their old position, they will most likely choose someone who exhibits the same behaviors and maintain status quo rather than someone whose style contrasts theirs leading to difficulties and comparisons as to which manager is better by the employees.

Another point about this article/study is that those who exemplify this trait are unlikely to acknowledge it and write it off as something to the effect of "this is how the job is done".
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rcarolm says:
I just left a company where my boss (female) was such a micro-manager, and full of herself, that she actually believed no one could be better than her, and thus she fired people who she felt could possibly replace her in her position (that would be me).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nurse_goodbody says:
Interestig article! I am curious to know the gender gap findings because it seems like some women let any tiny bit of power go to their head where the majority of men just roll with it. Note that I said majority of men...there will always be both men & women who abuse power because of personality disorders or whatever the reason may be. That's not what I'm talking about. Also interesting would be the age findings. I know a 29- yr old woman on a management track... I already pity the people who will be under her for the first 10 or 15 years of her management season. She's just a billing clerk but already everything is black & white to her (unless she is one who goofed up of course).
reply