By

Laura Vanderkam /

MoneyWatch/ August 2, 2012, 7:00 AM

How having too much stuff wastes your time

Flickr user trenttsd

(MoneyWatch) One of the most fascinating books to come out this summer is a photograph-heavy academic tome called "Life at Home in the Twenty-First Century." Produced by researchers at UCLA's Center on Everyday Lives of Families (CELF), the book documents the results of an anthropological study of 32 middle-class dual-income Los Angeles households with children.

The takeaway? American families have a lot of stuff. The pictures in this book -- of rooms almost ridiculously packed -- are worth a thousand words, but the words and numbers say a lot, too. Three-fourths of the families studied had stopped using their garages to park their cars. They had too much stuff crammed in every nook to drive in, and so had to consign their cars to the street or the driveway. They had enough food to survive all manner of natural disasters; 47 percent had second fridges. The families' primary kitchen fridges were decorated with a mean of 52 objects: coupons, photos, magnets.

The families gained 30 percent more possessions with the arrival of each child, with one family owning 165 Beanie Babies. The families owned an average of 212 CDs and 90 DVDs or VHS tapes (The study started in 2001.) These 32 families owned 99 TVs. A few of the families had more TVs than people.

The CELF researchers asked families to narrate tours of their homes; many of the mothers in particular described the stress of too much clutter. They'd spent lots of time and money buying objects, and over time the stuff simply stacked up, almost crowding these families out of their modest homes.

These people aren't on a reality show about hoarding. They're normal families. We overbuy all kinds of things in our consumer culture -- billions of items of clothes per year when most of us have overstuffed closets already. Too much stuff becomes visually bothersome in a house, but it also costs time in these four categories:

1. Time spent cleaning and de-cluttering. Picking up 40 objects takes more time than picking up 10.

2. Time spent hunting for something to wear. Too many clothes make morning choices overwhelming.

3. Time spent hunting for lost items. When you need scissors, tape, or a thermometer, cluttered drawers can render them invisible.

4. Time spent working to pay for food and other items that go bad. Freezer burn, spoilage, and broken items mean money thrown in the trash.

How to claw that time back? Own less stuff. Getting rid of stuff take time, so it's best not to acquire it in the first place. One of the good things about being really busy with kids and work is there's no time to shop. When I found myself in the mall for the first time in about a year the other day, I felt like an anthropologist visiting a foreign culture. Do people really buy T-shirts that fall apart after two washes? Apparently so. But just remember that too much stuff means throwing away time as well as money. And while you can make more money, no one can make more time.

How do you keep stuff from accumulating in your house?

Photo courtesy of Flickr user trenttsd

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kimhoch says:
You spend your 20's and 30's acquiring "stuff" and your 40's getting rid of it all. I've been trying to declutter for the last few years and I still have things I need to get rid of. Articles like this one, and shows on organization (including those crazy hoarders shows) are always the prompt I need to get back at it. The thing I haven't figured out yet is how to quit buying. For me it is clothes and shoes (I am such a stereotype of a woman sometimes). The hard part is the idea that if I have enough choices, I will always have the perfect outfit. The truth is, I wear my favorites and struggle to figure out what to wear every day - so much so sometimes I wish we had to wear uniforms to the office.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FrenchyInOntario says:
When I moved from CT to Toronto in 2005, I was schlepping it all in a self-moving van. The less crap I had, the less I had to schlep...so I got rid of stuff in waves in the months leading up to my departure. Even so, when I opened boxes later to move into my new apartment, I still wondered, "Why the hell did I bring this? Why didn't I just throw this away?" Fortunately there is a Goodwill just around the corner for me and the rest I dumpstered.

Now whenever I acquire something new I have to get rid of something else. Helps keep the clutter down.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
VortexMojo says:
People have been programmed to consume. The first step in breaking this consumerism addiction is to get rid of those 100 TV's! That cuts off the source of the constant brainwashing that you need to buy a new car, new furniture, a new mattress or carpeting, the latest drugs, this year's fashions, the latest electronic gadget, more insurance, and everything else that you already have or don't need. Of course, these product ads are interspersed with credit card ads which subliminally tell you it's okay to go spend - you don't need any money right now because you have 6 years to pay, no interest until 2015, and free delivery tomorrow - before you come to your senses and change your mind. This consumerism addiction is based in the thinking that having more makes you more. It doesn't. It "takes" more...more money to insure it, store it, run it, clean it, fix it when it breaks, maintain it so it doesn't, buy replacement parts, spend more so you can use it, and eventually spend money to get rid of it. Then, when you get too much stuff to fit in your house, you believe you need a bigger house. Moving all your stuff to a new house makes you pine for the days when you were in college and could move all your possessions in 2 trips in your hatchback Honda Civic. No, having more doesn't make you more; becoming more makes you more. Soon, maybe people will come to the realization that the desire to acquire more than they need or deserve is a mental illness. Once you sell or give away all the stuff you don't need or shouldn't have bought in the first place only the truly valuable things will be left. Cherish those.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ellen666100 says:
When I lost my house to foreclosure, I really had to downsize. I only took the furniture and clothes I knew would fit into a small apartment. I had to just let a lot of things go because I did not have space to store it. I was also moving 500 miles away so it had to fit in the small moving vehicle loaned to me by a friend.
It was so uplifting to my spirit to not have so much stuff "weighing" on me any more. My goal now is to build a "tiny" house and make myself fit in it. This will involve getting rid of most of my furniture because it will be built into the space. I will also have to downsize more than I have already but the challenge is welcome.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
VortexMojo says:
People have been programmed to consume. The first step in breaking this consumerism addiction is to get rid of those 100 TV's! That cuts off the source of the constant brainwashing that you need to buy a new car, new furniture, a new mattress or carpeting, the latest drugs, this year's fashions, the latest electronic gadget, more insurance, and everything else that you already have or don't need. Of course, these product ads are interspersed with credit card ads which subliminally tell you it's okay to go spend - you don't need any money right now because you have 6 years to pay, no interest until 2015, and free delivery tomorrow - before you come to your senses and change your mind. This consumerism addiction is based in the thinking that having more makes you more. It doesn't. It "takes" more...more money to insure it, store it, run it, clean it, fix it when it breaks, maintain it so it doesn't, buy replacement parts, spend more so you can use it, and eventually spend money to get rid of it. Then, when you get too much stuff to fit in your house, you believe you need a bigger house. Moving all your stuff to a new house makes you pine for the days when you were in college and could move all your possessions in 2 trips in your hatchback Honda Civic. No, having more doesn't make you more; becoming more makes you more. Soon, maybe people will come to the realization that the desire to acquire more than they need or deserve is a mental illness. Once you sell or give away all the stuff you don't need or shouldn't have bought in the first place only the truly valuable things will be left. Cherish those.
reply
robertclarkrhodes2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@VortexMojo, you are absolutely right! (by the way, what a wonderful article). I believe that "too much stuff" devalues the stuff we have. The less stuff, the more you appreciate what you have.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ShellyLove2002 says:
I am in the process of decluttering our small home. With only 2 people living in a 3-bedroom house it should be fairly easy. One thing that makes it challenging is pushing my son to give away (or throw away) things he doesn't need or use anymore. I HATE clutter, so I will be working on that when he goes away to visit friends soon.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
evelyncucchiara says:
Oh my gosh! This is exactly what I've been preaching to my family, my customers, (I'm an efficiency expert for entrepreneurs), anyone who will listen! Too much stuff does nothing but drag you down - and make your home a stressful place. I'm convinced that many vacations are taken just because people can't relax at home. Opinions?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Tobalcane100 says:
I have a wife and two kids. I do most of the housework and known as the clutter police. My policy is if I notice something that has not been used for the past six months; I will first put up a warning that this item has not been used and wait for a rebuttal. If they look at me and shrug their shoulders, its out the door.
reply
evelyncucchiara replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Love this idea Tobalcane! Really divides what is used from what is not.
lvanderkam replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I like this idea too - seems fair, giving opportunity for a rebuttal. I try to notice what's in piles, and if the pile hasn't moved in a bit, the whole pile goes out the door...
See all 12 Comments