September 8, 2010 5:24 PM
- Text
Microsoft Rumored To Buy Symantec. Why Would It Bother?
(MoneyWatch)
Sometimes I hear a rumor that sounds like it's landed from another planet. Today's is Microsoft (MSFT) might buy Symantec (SYMC). Perhaps this is making stocks move and hearts go pit-a-pat, but it sounds like one of the goofiest ideas you could hear.
At first blush -- sure, maybe there's a fit between the company that produces the most widely used PC operating system in the world and a security company. Especially when Microsoft products have the reputation for being the favorite targets of hackers and digital criminals. But let's use a little reason here.
First, Symantec has often received its licks over performance issues. Even though the newest version of the Norton Internet Security product is supposed to be significantly faster than earlier ones, it still isn't at the highest rate of malware detection and it's still not the lightest weight on a CPU.
Second, Microsoft already has its own security products, including Security Essentials and its firewall. I actually use the former ever since finding it was the only of several products I tried to be able to remove a pernicious redirect virus. Not only do the products work, but Microsoft is already giving them away. Clearly it hasn't wanted to enter the pay-or-pray Windows security market. Why start now? And if it's not going to sell products for which it already has counterparts, why buy them in the first place?
Yes, McAfee (MFE) sold -- to Intel(INTC). Maybe a chip company like AMD (AMD) might consider a purchase to offset any apparent leverage that Intel might get. But if you were going to buy a security company for that reason, why not go with one that has even faster technology?
This sounds like another of the period frenzies you see when investors are unhappy with the performance. Or maybe when they're really ticked that Symantec plans to hold a virtual-only annual shareholders meeting, keeping the board out of direct confrontation, and arms' reach. Just think of it as another type of security.
Related:
Sometimes I hear a rumor that sounds like it's landed from another planet. Today's is Microsoft (MSFT) might buy Symantec (SYMC). Perhaps this is making stocks move and hearts go pit-a-pat, but it sounds like one of the goofiest ideas you could hear.At first blush -- sure, maybe there's a fit between the company that produces the most widely used PC operating system in the world and a security company. Especially when Microsoft products have the reputation for being the favorite targets of hackers and digital criminals. But let's use a little reason here.
First, Symantec has often received its licks over performance issues. Even though the newest version of the Norton Internet Security product is supposed to be significantly faster than earlier ones, it still isn't at the highest rate of malware detection and it's still not the lightest weight on a CPU.
Second, Microsoft already has its own security products, including Security Essentials and its firewall. I actually use the former ever since finding it was the only of several products I tried to be able to remove a pernicious redirect virus. Not only do the products work, but Microsoft is already giving them away. Clearly it hasn't wanted to enter the pay-or-pray Windows security market. Why start now? And if it's not going to sell products for which it already has counterparts, why buy them in the first place?
Yes, McAfee (MFE) sold -- to Intel(INTC). Maybe a chip company like AMD (AMD) might consider a purchase to offset any apparent leverage that Intel might get. But if you were going to buy a security company for that reason, why not go with one that has even faster technology?
This sounds like another of the period frenzies you see when investors are unhappy with the performance. Or maybe when they're really ticked that Symantec plans to hold a virtual-only annual shareholders meeting, keeping the board out of direct confrontation, and arms' reach. Just think of it as another type of security.
Related:
- Twitter Does What It Must, and That Pisses Off the Privacy World
- Intel's McAfee Acquisition: A Semi-Desperate Bid for Competitive Advantage
- Apple and WikiLeaks Show How Vulnerable Companies Are
- Apple iPhone, iPad Security Goes Into the Toilet and Down the Tubesu
- U.S. Infrastructure Is Vulnerable to Cyber Attack, but No One Will Do Anything
- Apple and Google Mobile Security Pits Get Deeper
-
Erik Sherman Erik Sherman is a widely published writer and editor who also does select ghosting and corporate work. Follow him on Twitter at @ErikSherman or on Facebook.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
- Wholesale inventories rose 1 percent in December
- States, Feds to announce new mortgage settlement
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Jack Hanna: Proposed exotic animal law too soft
- NY attorney general ends lawsuit against Intel
- Pharmacyclics rises after posting 2Q profit
- How the video games industry is faring
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "American Idol": Jim Carrey's daughter out, and then disaster
on CBS News






