February 3, 2010 7:30 AM
- Text
January Tech Job Cut Announcements Take a Rebound
(MoneyWatch)
Last month I happily wrote that, should the downward trend of job cuts continue, I'd stop doing this monthly post. As you have already guessed, it didn't. Outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas announced U.S. job cuts for last month, stating that they were the highest in five months, with retail and telecommunications being the big drivers. Here's a summary since January 2009:
Here a graph of the monthly results for the year with a trend line for the industry totals:
Retail you can understand, as the holiday shopping season comes to an end and the sales hangover sets in. Telecom didn't need many companies to boost the layoff announcements. Verizon (VZ) said that it would fire (because that's what it really comes down to) an additional 13,000 employees, even as the company had strong wireless growth and yet had a net loss for last quarter, largely because of the $3 billion it was taking from the 8,000 employees it had already sent packing. The problem is the landline business, which is not only waning, but which Verizon has seemed anxious to leave. In each of the last two years it dropped 13,000 employees from the landline business. Notice a pattern here?
It's tempting to say, "Oh, but that's a one-time thing." Unfortunately, it's almost always supposed to be a one time thing. But when you have large companies taking turns cutting jobs to preserve earnings, there's always another one-time thing to batter the industry a bit more. The level of industry layoffs is certainly down from this time last year, but I wouldn't make bets on this being the end. We have a number of factors:
Executioner image via stock.xchng user sateda, standard site license.
Last month I happily wrote that, should the downward trend of job cuts continue, I'd stop doing this monthly post. As you have already guessed, it didn't. Outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas announced U.S. job cuts for last month, stating that they were the highest in five months, with retail and telecommunications being the big drivers. Here's a summary since January 2009:
| Sector | January 09 | February 09 | March 09 | April 09 | May 09 | June 09 | |
| Electronics | 11,050 | 11,065 | 11,500 | 6,608 | 1,423 | 4,103 | |
| Computer | 22,330 | 3,960 | 5,290 | 1,702 | 15,384 | 2,795 | |
| Telecom | 13,056 | 5,666 | 250 | 262 | 812 | 802 | |
| Total | 20,628 | 2,386 | 1,794 | 18,197 | 12,708 | 808 | 17,204 |
| Sector | July 09 | August 09 | September 09 | October 09 | November 09 | December 09 | January 10 |
| Electronics | 1,343 | 1,562 | 683 | 10,882 | 4,792 | 239 | 559 |
| Computer | 1,684 | 75 | 494 | 7,089 | 4,106 | 352 | 2,635 |
| Telecom | 17,601 | 749 | 617 | 226 | 3,810 | 217 | 14,010 |
| Total | 20,628 | 2,386 | 1,794 | 18,197 | 12,708 | 808 | 17,204 |
Retail you can understand, as the holiday shopping season comes to an end and the sales hangover sets in. Telecom didn't need many companies to boost the layoff announcements. Verizon (VZ) said that it would fire (because that's what it really comes down to) an additional 13,000 employees, even as the company had strong wireless growth and yet had a net loss for last quarter, largely because of the $3 billion it was taking from the 8,000 employees it had already sent packing. The problem is the landline business, which is not only waning, but which Verizon has seemed anxious to leave. In each of the last two years it dropped 13,000 employees from the landline business. Notice a pattern here?It's tempting to say, "Oh, but that's a one-time thing." Unfortunately, it's almost always supposed to be a one time thing. But when you have large companies taking turns cutting jobs to preserve earnings, there's always another one-time thing to batter the industry a bit more. The level of industry layoffs is certainly down from this time last year, but I wouldn't make bets on this being the end. We have a number of factors:
- Hardware keeps getting cheaper, cutting out margin.
- Other industries are still hurting and IT budgets are under tight reins.
- Consumer spending is also tight.
- Increasingly, there are ways for people and businesses to find free or low-cost alternatives to services that once brought in revenue to companies.
Executioner image via stock.xchng user sateda, standard site license.
-
Erik Sherman Erik Sherman is a widely published writer and editor who also does select ghosting and corporate work. Follow him on Twitter at @ErikSherman or on Facebook.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Whitney Houston's voice will never be forgotten
- Turkmenistan votes in presidential election
- Was filmmaker's diary a screenplay for murder?
- Umberger's 2 goals give Jackets 3-1 win vs. Wild
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






