September 24, 2009 8:14 AM
- Text
Bartz Buying the Wrong Kool-Aid
(MoneyWatch)
So Yahoo is bringing a $100 million advertising campaign to Y!ou. But the attempt at rebranding recreates a classic strategic mistake and has the company buying into its sometimes questionable negative reputation.
As my colleague David Weir at BNET Media said, the campaign seems as much aimed at convincing Yahoo of its worth as it does of convincing consumers. But I have to disagree with David on one point. He says that Yahoo's share of Internet usage "has been stagnant for the past three years" and that "the likes of Google and Facebook flourished." That observation is simply wrong. Look at these U.S. usage numbers (unfortunately, I don't have access to global numbers) from Compete.com:
Yes, Yahoo has slipped a bit the last few months, but there is an overall close parallel between it and Google. When you've got as large an audience as these companies, high growth simply isn't going to happen. They're already at about a third of the entire country. And even at that, over roughly the last year alone, Yahoo's monthly unique visitors have gone up 8.6 percent.
I've noticed at times in the past that Wall Street tends to get particularly dour when it comes to Yahoo, even if the company's fundamental financials aren't all that bad. Granted, there have been plenty of problems in strategic focus and execution at the company. But rather than the Golden Kid who can do no wrong, Yahoo has become the Brass Kid who could do no right.
The problem it now faces is that Carol Bartz, coming from the outside, wants to be the conquering CEO, as new chief executives tend to do, to prove her own worth. Rather than taking the somewhat longer road of understanding what customers really want and making any necessary adjustments to Yahoo's operations, she's going down the road of rebranding.
Can spending $100 million do any good? Microsoft seems to have made some progress in getting Bing accepted as well as pushing back against Apple with large ad spends. But those were tactical. Large rebranding efforts are often like massive reorganizations: a last refuge for those who are trying to paint a pretty picture. And if you're suffering from a bout of self-loathing, no picture is going to be pretty enough.
Image via Flickr user P/UL, CC 2.0.
So Yahoo is bringing a $100 million advertising campaign to Y!ou. But the attempt at rebranding recreates a classic strategic mistake and has the company buying into its sometimes questionable negative reputation.As my colleague David Weir at BNET Media said, the campaign seems as much aimed at convincing Yahoo of its worth as it does of convincing consumers. But I have to disagree with David on one point. He says that Yahoo's share of Internet usage "has been stagnant for the past three years" and that "the likes of Google and Facebook flourished." That observation is simply wrong. Look at these U.S. usage numbers (unfortunately, I don't have access to global numbers) from Compete.com:
Yes, Yahoo has slipped a bit the last few months, but there is an overall close parallel between it and Google. When you've got as large an audience as these companies, high growth simply isn't going to happen. They're already at about a third of the entire country. And even at that, over roughly the last year alone, Yahoo's monthly unique visitors have gone up 8.6 percent.I've noticed at times in the past that Wall Street tends to get particularly dour when it comes to Yahoo, even if the company's fundamental financials aren't all that bad. Granted, there have been plenty of problems in strategic focus and execution at the company. But rather than the Golden Kid who can do no wrong, Yahoo has become the Brass Kid who could do no right.
The problem it now faces is that Carol Bartz, coming from the outside, wants to be the conquering CEO, as new chief executives tend to do, to prove her own worth. Rather than taking the somewhat longer road of understanding what customers really want and making any necessary adjustments to Yahoo's operations, she's going down the road of rebranding.
Can spending $100 million do any good? Microsoft seems to have made some progress in getting Bing accepted as well as pushing back against Apple with large ad spends. But those were tactical. Large rebranding efforts are often like massive reorganizations: a last refuge for those who are trying to paint a pretty picture. And if you're suffering from a bout of self-loathing, no picture is going to be pretty enough.
Image via Flickr user P/UL, CC 2.0.
-
Erik Sherman Erik Sherman is a widely published writer and editor who also does select ghosting and corporate work. Follow him on Twitter at @ErikSherman or on Facebook.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Suspect testifies in ND gun-in-courtroom case
- Washington state poised to approve gay marriage
- AP: Pa. rep says he'll resign when sentenced
- Picht named bureau chief in Minn., Neb., Dakotas
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






