August 12, 2009 9:04 AM
- Text
Google's Caffeine -- They've Gotta Learn About Marketing
(MoneyWatch)
Google is one of those companies that markets by use. It gets more ad dollar share because people use the search engine more than others. Pretty simple, and helps control costs. But although that has worked in the core business, the company has assumed that it will work the same way in everything, including its "new" search engine version, code-named Caffeine. Hate to point it out this harshly, but in terms of promoting a supposedly improved version of its core service, Caffeine is a snooze.
There may be something significant going on, but danged if I can figure out what it is. On the surface, the new Google looks like the old Google. But when you search for something ... it still largely seems like the old Google, There's some shift of what appears at the top (How many people go past, say, the second page of results?), but if you're searching for something, you're not necessarily going to notice the difference.
I tried a search on both old and new versions for Tristan Tzara, one of the co-founders of the Dada art movement. Was one of the results notably better than the other? If I knew enough to give a definitive answer, I'd probably not be doing this search in the first place. Now, I think there is a bit of genius at work in the simple layout of the Google search page. Who wants the feeling of a cluttered screen when you're trying to find something? I suspect that might be a larger-than-you'd-think reason why Google pulled ahead of Yahoo. When the screen is filled, it feels like you're trying to find something in a cluttered office. And it's bad enough that my physical surroundings are messy. Why put up with virtual oppression?
Maybe Google is only interested in feedback. But when it comes to new products and versions, everything becomes marketing, and this is a company that isn't good at it. They tried to come up with a browser, attracted curiosity users in the first week, and never moved beyond that market share. The "build it and they will come" mentality did so badly on Google Apps that the company is actually taking out billboard ads to try attracting users. When you boast 1.5 million businesses, meaning multiple more users, but only a few hundred thousand actually paying, the law of attraction clearly isn't working for you.
In general, Google has to start doing better selling people. The "do no evil" image has been tarnished, regulators are swarming over the company like freeloaders at an open bar party, and the business is still completely and utterly dependent on search advertising revenue which, while still large, is still a point of strategic weakness. And by releasing the "improved" version of its commercially most important offering without anything that looks different is to dangerously minimize keeping customers happy, or at least interested.
Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.
Google is one of those companies that markets by use. It gets more ad dollar share because people use the search engine more than others. Pretty simple, and helps control costs. But although that has worked in the core business, the company has assumed that it will work the same way in everything, including its "new" search engine version, code-named Caffeine. Hate to point it out this harshly, but in terms of promoting a supposedly improved version of its core service, Caffeine is a snooze.There may be something significant going on, but danged if I can figure out what it is. On the surface, the new Google looks like the old Google. But when you search for something ... it still largely seems like the old Google, There's some shift of what appears at the top (How many people go past, say, the second page of results?), but if you're searching for something, you're not necessarily going to notice the difference.
I tried a search on both old and new versions for Tristan Tzara, one of the co-founders of the Dada art movement. Was one of the results notably better than the other? If I knew enough to give a definitive answer, I'd probably not be doing this search in the first place. Now, I think there is a bit of genius at work in the simple layout of the Google search page. Who wants the feeling of a cluttered screen when you're trying to find something? I suspect that might be a larger-than-you'd-think reason why Google pulled ahead of Yahoo. When the screen is filled, it feels like you're trying to find something in a cluttered office. And it's bad enough that my physical surroundings are messy. Why put up with virtual oppression?
Maybe Google is only interested in feedback. But when it comes to new products and versions, everything becomes marketing, and this is a company that isn't good at it. They tried to come up with a browser, attracted curiosity users in the first week, and never moved beyond that market share. The "build it and they will come" mentality did so badly on Google Apps that the company is actually taking out billboard ads to try attracting users. When you boast 1.5 million businesses, meaning multiple more users, but only a few hundred thousand actually paying, the law of attraction clearly isn't working for you.
In general, Google has to start doing better selling people. The "do no evil" image has been tarnished, regulators are swarming over the company like freeloaders at an open bar party, and the business is still completely and utterly dependent on search advertising revenue which, while still large, is still a point of strategic weakness. And by releasing the "improved" version of its commercially most important offering without anything that looks different is to dangerously minimize keeping customers happy, or at least interested.
Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.
-
Erik Sherman Erik Sherman is a widely published writer and editor who also does select ghosting and corporate work. Follow him on Twitter at @ErikSherman or on Facebook.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
- Wholesale inventories rose 1 percent in December
- States, Feds to announce new mortgage settlement
- Management changes at Ford
- Unemployment aid applications near a 4-year low
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Mortgage settlement nets $40M for DC homeowners
- NH to receive $43.6M in mortgage settlement
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Report says Canada could support up to 9 NHL teams
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "American Idol": Jim Carrey's daughter out, and then disaster
on CBS News






