July 31, 2009 9:18 AM
- Text
Is Apple No to Google Voice Really SEC Love?
(MoneyWatch) There's plenty of speculation about Apple turning down Google Voice for its app store and whether the real instigator is AT&T wanting to protect its traffic. That might be, except that Google Voice still depends on either having existing phone service or paying the data charges to run a VoIP link, like Skype. In either case, AT&T makes money -- well, for at least as long as AT&T keeps the iPhone to itself. So how about a different view? Maybe it's nothing to do at all with AT&T and all about the Securities Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission.
Let's remember that there's currently a fair amount of controversy about how chummy Apple and Google have been, particularly in having two board directors in common. Things even got to the point where it sounded like the Apple board would consider whether having Eric Schmidt as a director would continue to be wise. But you haven't heard anything else about it, right? Maybe this whole Google Voice conflict has been a carefully constructed PR move to demonstrate that there is real competition between the two and that neither company is selling its investors or consumers out to the other. It's classic misdirection and the sort of thing that you might expect from sophisticated media campaigners.
It might be that I'm barking up the wrong tree and that AT&T is the real instigator. However, it would be foolish not to at least consider whether something far more convoluted and sneaky is underway.
Let's remember that there's currently a fair amount of controversy about how chummy Apple and Google have been, particularly in having two board directors in common. Things even got to the point where it sounded like the Apple board would consider whether having Eric Schmidt as a director would continue to be wise. But you haven't heard anything else about it, right? Maybe this whole Google Voice conflict has been a carefully constructed PR move to demonstrate that there is real competition between the two and that neither company is selling its investors or consumers out to the other. It's classic misdirection and the sort of thing that you might expect from sophisticated media campaigners.
It might be that I'm barking up the wrong tree and that AT&T is the real instigator. However, it would be foolish not to at least consider whether something far more convoluted and sneaky is underway.
-
Erik Sherman Erik Sherman is a widely published writer and editor who also does select ghosting and corporate work. Follow him on Twitter at @ErikSherman or on Facebook.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Jason Wu revisits Chinese roots at Fashion Week
- How Jason Wu picks models, tweaks looks for runway
- Libertine Fashion Week show big on embellishment
- Libertine Fashion Week show big on embellishment
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






