May 27, 2009 3:55 PM
- Text
2009 US Tech Wages Steady Vs. 2008
(MoneyWatch) The latest estimates on technology wages in the US are in from tech recruiting firm Yoh. Their take "[b]ased on conversations with more than 9,000 hiring managers in over 15 major metropolitan areas" is that -- surprise, surprise -- wages are pretty flat compared to 2009. Here's a look at the data:
The way such indexes work is that some period -- in this case, January 2001 -- is taken as the base level. Then wages in other periods become a multiple of the first.
Note that these numbers aren't the ones in the press release that made the rounds today -- they didn't quite agree with how the company had reported jobs before, so I asked for an apples-to-apples comparison. Also note that Yoh compiles results every four weeks, so we're seeing the development of 2009, compared to previous years, through some time in March.
My guess is that this should have been predictable because companies were largely laying off employees, not hiring, which means there was little opportunity to increase or decrease wages. Furthermore, executives would probably be nervous about both laying off employees and issuing pay cuts because they might be seen as more economically troubled than their competitors.
The way such indexes work is that some period -- in this case, January 2001 -- is taken as the base level. Then wages in other periods become a multiple of the first.Note that these numbers aren't the ones in the press release that made the rounds today -- they didn't quite agree with how the company had reported jobs before, so I asked for an apples-to-apples comparison. Also note that Yoh compiles results every four weeks, so we're seeing the development of 2009, compared to previous years, through some time in March.
My guess is that this should have been predictable because companies were largely laying off employees, not hiring, which means there was little opportunity to increase or decrease wages. Furthermore, executives would probably be nervous about both laying off employees and issuing pay cuts because they might be seen as more economically troubled than their competitors.
-
Erik Sherman Erik Sherman is a widely published writer and editor who also does select ghosting and corporate work. Follow him on Twitter at @ErikSherman or on Facebook.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Wash. moves step closer to legalizing gay marriage
- Air Force trains flight attendants for VIP trips
- Item in Powell unit tests positive for blood
- Video: Man tries to carry girl away at Ga. Walmart
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






