Why the jobless rate in November was revised up

John Moore/Getty Images

NEW YORK Unlike most economic data from the U.S. government, the monthly unemployment rate isn't usually revised later. If, for example, the Labor Department says the rate was 7.7 percent in a particular month, that rate normally stays 7.7 percent.

Until January, that is.

• Weekly jobless claims rise to 372,000
  
• December jobs: 1.8M jobs created in 2012
  
• Job market shrugs off wrenching budget fight
  

Every January, the government updates the formulas it uses to calculate unemployment data. The new formulas can change some of the rates for the previous five years. Typically, though, only few of the monthly rates are revised.

On Friday, the government revised the unemployment rates for two months in 2012. The rate for November was revised up to 7.8 percent from 7.7 percent. And the rate for July was revised down to 8.2 percent from 8.3 percent.

By contrast, monthly job creation numbers are revised twice in the two months after they're first released. They're also revised annually. The result is a frequently substantial gap between an initially reported jobs total and the final revised total.

For example, the government initially said employers added only 96,000 jobs in August. That wouldn't generally be enough to lower the unemployment rate. But the number jumped after two revisions to a robust 192,000.

The unemployment rate for that month still stands at 8.1 percent - just as the government originally reported.

[timchi1956]

December was part of the holiday season many temp employees were hired. The Obama administration did not acknowledge that fact instead they chose to dance around claiming they are the great job creators and how their moronic policies work. Of course, those of us with more than one living brain cell (unlike those who voted for Obama) knew the truth the day the deceptive results were announced. This is only my humble opinion of course but deceit seems to be repeating pattern in Obamaland.