AP/ November 26, 2012, 1:10 PM

Buffett urges Congress to raise taxes on the rich

Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway

Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway / Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

OMAHA, Nebraska Billionaire Warren Buffett is again calling for higher taxes on America's "ultrarich" and he's urging Congress to compromise on spending cuts and tax increases.

Buffett said the current tax system has contributed to the growing gap between rich and poor. He said he supports President Barack Obama's proposal to end the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, but he'd prefer setting the point where taxes increase at $500,000 income instead of the $250,000 the White House proposed.

Buffett expressed his views on fiscal policy Monday in an opinion article that appeared in The New York Times (NYT) on the same day Congress returned from the Thanksgiving holiday.

In the article, Buffett mocked the idea that investors would pull back if capital gains taxes increase. Buffett said he's never seen that happen even when capital gains taxes above 25 percent early in his investing career.

"Let's forget about the rich and ultrarich going on strike and stuffing their ample funds under their mattresses if - gasp - capital gains rates and ordinary income rates are increased," Buffett said. "The ultrarich, including me, will forever pursue investment opportunities."

Buffett, who is chairman and CEO of Omaha-based Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), has complained for several years that Congress has been coddling the wealthy, and Obama even called one of his tax reform proposals the "Buffett Rule."

Buffett reiterated his call for a minimum tax of 30 percent on income between $1 million and $10 million, and a 35 percent rate for income above that.

He said both Republicans and Democrats will have to make major concessions to deal with the nation's fiscal problems. Congress is trying to address the so-called fiscal cliff of automatic tax increases and spending cuts that could be triggered at the start of the new year.

"All of America is waiting for Congress to offer a realistic and concrete plan for getting back to this fiscally sound path," Buffett said. "Nothing less is acceptable."

Berkshire Hathaway owns more than 80 companies; including insurance, utility, railroad, furniture, jewelry, manufacturing, restaurant and apparel companies. Berkshire's insurance and utility businesses typically account for more than half of his company's net income.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
58 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hillzhaveays says:
osephp5 says:
The primary reason that the rich pay a lower rate than the rest of us is due to the fact that most of their income comes from capital gains which are taxed far too low. The current rate of 15% is the lowest in recent history! And yet super-rich like the Honeywell CEO think it should drop to zero! The audacity of these pampered rich is unbelievable!

When you tax capital gains less than ordinary income, it is the same as saying that making money by owning things is better than labor. That's what capital gains are---making money by lending out money or property. Why should this be considered a better way to earn money than someone like a taxicab driver or factory worker that labors for a living?
_______________________________

Investing doesn't always make money. Investments can produce a return or evaporate into thin air and you lose everything. There is substantial risk of loss in investing - either in stocks or in opening a business or buying property and watching it appreciate. Investment is also one of the primary economic drivers in this country. Without it we cannot survive.

Thus, the government incentivizes investment by taxing it less to offset the risk of loss. It's pretty simple really. Your lack of understanding of this is common amongst the lower classes and those of limited education. They see those who are more successful than they are and don't understand what those people do with their money or why. The have-nots will eternally be envious of the haves.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
josephp5 says:
The primary reason that the rich pay a lower rate than the rest of us is due to the fact that most of their income comes from capital gains which are taxed far too low. The current rate of 15% is the lowest in recent history! And yet super-rich like the Honeywell CEO think it should drop to zero! The audacity of these pampered rich is unbelievable!

When you tax capital gains less than ordinary income, it is the same as saying that making money by owning things is better than labor. That's what capital gains are---making money by lending out money or property. Why should this be considered a better way to earn money than someone like a taxicab driver or factory worker that labors for a living?
reply
RollotheNorman replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Awww. It isn't as bad as when J.P. Morgan had to lend the Treasury $65M. Yet. Just a little while longer America.

http://www.apnotes.net/ch23.html
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Steel95 says:
;The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.7 percent of all individual income taxes in 2002. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group's tax share has grown faster than their income share

Below are links. Please make my check for $1,000 out to the US treasury and mail it to them. I guess you got me on the missing statement of federal income taxes but that is where most of the $ for the Federal government is obtained.
I am sure they will spend it wisely. I have no problem with taxes. First you have to realize the super rich already do pay a higher % than us. Remember there is always someone who makes less $ than us who could easily say we should pay more. Everyone comments on the 1% but why can't we agree there needs to be cuts. ( •The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.7 percent of all individual income taxes in 2002. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group's tax share has grown faster than their income share)


http://taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=3505
Source: U.S. Treasury, Office of Tax Analysis
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/incometaxandtheirs/a/whopaysmost.htm
reply
cubscout09 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In 2009, the top 1.25% (AGI over $1.5 million) only paid $150 billion in federal income taxes. That is closer to 15% of all federal income taxes.

There is also the disturbing inequity in the fact that taxes actually decrease on AGI over $5 million.

If you really want to see what is going on, try this link:

http://taxfoundation.org/article/summary-latest-federal-individual-income-tax-data-0
linkicon reporticon emailicon
freeamerica31 says:
Warren Buffet is very smart but don't let the guy play you!

He says raise rates on anyone making $500,000 and up...really....really!

Most families don't make $75,000 with both the spouses working. If you make a combined salary up to $100,000 a year you are doing well and very well can afford to pay more in taxes. I also believe that anyone earning an income should have to pay at least 1% because you benefit...minimal but you benefit from those taxes.

Get rid of the "Child Tax Credit". You had kids then you should be required to support them ladies and gentlemen. Get kids off of social security...they don't belong in that program. Cut, Cap, Balance and increase revenue and pay the deficit off and never have one again.

Bottom line is Warren Buffet is no different than Mitt Romney in that he doesn't know how much the working class make throughout the U.S.. Maybe we should just have a law that says once you have reached a $500 million dollars all your additional funds regardless of where their coming from go to the people since they did most the work for you rich folk.
reply
RollotheNorman replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You're a funny man.
freeamerica31 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ROLLOTHENORMAN it would be funny if it weren't so true.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
Unfortunately since Wall Street completely took over the government for maximum profits, they were able to appoint worker slaves to vote for them and not for us. So I don't expect anything to change until millions of us unite to general strike.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54200 says:
Interesting that a guy that actually walks the walk thinks this way. While the Rush-bots (with their minimum wage jobs) that post here disagree with him.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Filmguy870 says:
The GOP needs to tell Grover Norquist to GO TO HELL!!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nfission235 says:
Buffet's right, it only makes sense. Should've happened already but the Republican dictator Norquist was squeezing the balls of his toadies.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MIO42 says:
There are no words to describe characters like buffet
His wealth comes at a huge immeasurable Cost to Families
A cost that manifests itself in so many ways it would take years to describe
Does he care about their plight?
He's getting richer isn't he ?
reply
joesapper replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
the capital gains tax on the markets would crush the markets and the world knows it , so while Buffet speaks , he is doing everything to protect the markets , as the real rich are far richer than we know as market money is protected until it is turned into cash .

the little guy thinks anything above 7% is good , well the real rich seek much more than 20% in the world markets , and that is a guy that is very careful with risk .
PatDaddy67 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@joesapper

Wrong! The CG tax only applies when profit is taken. A high CG tax encourages monies to remain in the market to avoid taking a tax hit. So long as the cash stays in the market and is re-invested is will earn or lose solely on market performance.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrleme says:
I suggest we take MOST of Buffet's money and use it to make a dent in our national debit if he's so concerned about it. Why pass the plate around?
reply
stevehamilton858 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, principally because this is the USA and what you're suggesting would be against the law of the land. Buffet is a very smart investor and businessman and he has some good ideas about what elected officials should do to get America's economy back in balance. My sense is that he knows more about economics than anyone in Washington, and the members of both parties would do well to listen to his advice. He's being very pragmatic, not partisan, in his suggestions.
mtracy99 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Buffet wants to make an even bigger dent in the national debt by making all of the rich pay their fair share, including the Walton kids who inherited their money and are part of our lazy idle rich who do nothing except collect stock dividends.
See all 58 Comments