Autonomy's ex-CEO denies blame for HP's $5B loss

Hewlett-Packard headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif. / Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
NEW YORK Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) said on Tuesday that it's the victim of a multi-billion dollar fraud at the hands of a British company it bought last year that lied about its finances.
Autonomy's former CEO Mike Lynch said HP's allegations are false.
In a statement to the Financial Times, Lynch said "The former management team of Autonomy was shocked to see this statement today, and flatly rejects these allegations, which are false."
- HP takes an $8B hit
- HP earnings: Accounting issues end an ugly year
- Meg Whitman accused of enforcing noncompetitive agreement
HP CEO Meg Whitman said executives at Autonomy Corporation PLC "willfully" boosted the company's figures through various accounting tricks, which convinced HP to pay $9.7 billion for the company in October 2011.
HP is now taking an $8.8 billion charge to align Autonomy's purchase price with what HP now says is its real value. More than $5 billion of that charge is due to false accounting, HP said.
The revelation is another blow for HP, which is struggling to reinvent itself as PC and printer sales shrink. The company's stock hit a 10-year low in morning trading.
Among other things, Autonomy makes search engines that help companies find vital information stored across computer networks. Acquiring it was part of an attempt by HP to strengthen its portfolio of high-value products and services for corporations and government agencies. The deal was approved by Whitman's predecessor, Leo Apotheker, but closed three weeks into Whitman's tenure as chief executive. Whitman was a member of HP's board of directors when Apotheker initiated the Autonomy purchase.
Among the tricks used at Autonomy, Whitman said: The company had been booking the sale of computers as software revenue and claiming the cost of making the machines as a marketing expense. Revenue from long-term contracts was booked up front, instead of over time.
As a result, Autonomy appeared to be more profitable than it was and seemed to be growing its core software business faster than was actually the case. The moves were apparently designed to groom the company for an acquisition, Whitman said.
Once HP bought the company, Autonomy's reported revenue growth and profit margin quickly declined. The company's former CEO Lynch continued to run the company as part of HP, but Whitman forced him out on May 23 because it was not living up to expectations.
"Little did I know that there was more than met the eye," Whitman said.
With Lynch gone, a senior Autonomy executive volunteered information about the alleged accounting irregularities, prompting an internal investigation, Whitman said.
Lynch told the Financial Times that Autonomy has been mismanaged since HP bought the company. "It took 10 years to build Autonomy's industry-leading technology," Lynch said.
The case has been referred to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the UK's Serious Fraud Office, she said. The company will also try to recoup some of the cash it paid for Autonomy through lawsuits.
On a conference call with Whitman following the earnings report, analyst Ben Reitzes of Barclays Capital asked who will be held responsible internally for the disastrous acquisition.
Whitman answered that the two executives who should have been held responsible - Apotheker and strategy chief Shane Robison - are gone. But the deal was also approved by the board of directors.
"Most of the board was here and voted for this deal, and we feel terribly about that," Whitman said. "What I will say is that the board relied on audited financials. Audited by Deloitte - not `Brand X' accounting firm, but Deloitte. During our very extensive due diligence process, we hired KPMG to audit Deloitte. And neither of them saw what we now see after someone came forward to point us in the right direction."
Apotheker told The Associated Press on Tuesday that he was "stunned and disappointed" to learn of the allegations against Autonomy, and pointed out that they had gone undiscovered by HP's auditors, executives and directors.
Deloitte UK said it could not comment on the matter because of client confidentiality rules.
Whitman said she still views Autonomy as a "growth engine for HP software," albeit a weaker one than initially thought. HP has been attempting to morph itself into a company that not only makes computer hardware but one that delivers software and services, too.
HP's stock dipped $1.59, or 12 percent, to $11.72 in afternoon trading. Just after the market's open, the stock hit $11.35, its lowest level since 2002.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Why geniuses don't have jobs
- Microsoft slashes Surface prices to lure buyers
- Bernanke holds the line on Fed monetary policy
- Have you mastered the art of listening?
- Look who doesn't deserve financial aid at NYU
- Fed says it will continue $85B in bond purchases
- Chrysler expected to make Jeep recall refusal official















Assuming that's the case and it's not the system cannibalizing itself as a coincidental happenstance, which is just as possible.
Either way, we voted for improvement in 2008 and Obama did indeed show compromising with the GOP has done little good. There are three possibilities one can fathom from here, but insufficient exists for each of those to be conclusive.
Either way, the change of progress seems hindered.
Atlas didn't shrug because Atlas never existed. Atlas is a fictional character, written by a hypocrite who denounced collectivism until she needed to partake in it.
But I think a lot of the middle/working class have shrugged... there are four reasons for that...