Stocks sink on Europe, Fiscal Cliff

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Nov. 7, 2012. / AP Photo/Henny Ray Abrams
(MoneyWatch) Don't blame today's stock sell-off on President Obama's win. For most of the pre-market session, futures were barely moving, and then the bottom fell out pushing down U.S. markets by more than 2.3 percent across the board. What happened?
About 2 hours before the opening bell, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi acknowledged that the euro zone crisis that has dragged down the southern economies of Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal is now harming Germany. "Germany has so far been largely insulated from some of the difficulties elsewhere in the euro area. But the latest data suggest that these developments are now starting to affect the German economy." Uh-oh -- Germany and the wealthier Northern European countries were supposed to inoculate the eurozone against widespread disaster. Accordingly, investors were reminded that Europe remains a total mess, which is why European stock markets closed down by more than 2 percent.
Obama wins: Will your taxes rise?
On top of the European debt crisis rearing its ugly head, investors were spooked by tough words from partisan politicians over the nation's Fiscal Cliff. The combination of tax increases and spending cuts, which total more than $600 billion, are scheduled to go into effect in January and could send the U.S. economy back into a recession, according to the Congressional Budget Office. By some estimates, jumping off the cliff will cause the economy to shrink by half of a percent next year and unemployment could rise from 7.9 percent to over 9 percent.
Ratings agency Fitch drew the line in the sand this morning, saying that President Obama must quickly forge an agreement with Congress to prevent a series of tax increases and spending cuts that kick in next year, or risk losing the federal government's top 'AAA' rating next year. Last year, Fitch downgraded its outlook for the U.S. rating to negative after Congress and the Obama administration failed to meet a deadline for a plan.
Ailing Europe + Fiscal Cliff = Stock market sell off. Here's was the damage for the day:
- Dow Jones Industrial Average: 12,932 -312 points or 2.36%
- S&P 500 Index 1394: -33 points or 2.37%
- NASDAQ Composite 2937: -74 points or 2.48%
As always, remember to "Keep Calm and Carry On" during major market moves. Here are 3 reminders so you don't shoot yourself in the foot and make a change to your portfolio out of fear or anxiety:
1) Don't make any rash decisions amid a big downturn
2) Maintain diversified balanced portfolio
3) Stick to your game plan!
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Seeking solutions to the student aid mess
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- LinkedIn: 3 tips for building a better profile
- Yahoo buys blogging site Tumblr for $1.1 billion
- Kellogg re-inventing Special K brand
- Fired for violating an unwritten policy
- Student loans -- public or private?














well this is a signal of strong confidence ?
so if the bill was paid for 4 in Libya would that restore a stable bridge over the fiscal cliff , I think the divide is clear , but is mind set of both sides clear ?
I have no clue as to what ships will drift to close the gap or from what port.
---------------------
Of course you wouldn't count on it. Even though you've seen this happen dozens of times now. You won't count on it because it doesn't serve your purpose. You need that glass to be half empty so you can make a point.
So really, it's the bad news that helps you sleep, not the good news.
How screwed up is that?
Sophisticated is having regulations in place to prevent the bubble in the first place.
The real world is not anywhere near as simplistic as you imply. Whether a tax increase or a regulation is good or bad depends entirely on its purpose and who it targets.
Believe it or not, there are some people who earn significantly more than we do but pay significantly less taxes because of loopholes. Getting them to pay their fair share of taxes is not bad in my opinion.
As far as regulations go, you need to look at their costs vs benefits to see if they are good or bad. For example, compounding pharmacies must satisfy strict regulations regarding sterilization. Yes, this does require more work and hassle on their part but the alternative is what we witnessed with the meningitis debacle where a company didn't follow the regulations and many people died as a result. One of them could have been you or me.
There's also a hidden message in statements like yours, a re-broadcast from the Reagan era, that basically says that if you lower taxes and remove regulations on corporations they will use that advantage to hire more people and you will get trickle down of the benefits. That connection is no longer very strong in the days of multinational corporations. It used to be that their prime way of making money was to provide more products or services which required hiring more people. Now they have many more options.
A falling market is not a bad thing, to blame them on a president is ridiculous, unless you also give the president credit for the social improvements also.