Justice Department won't prosecute Goldman in probe
The headquarters of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is seen on Sept. 16, 2008, in New York City. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
(AP) WASHINGTON - The Justice Department says it won't prosecute Wall Street firm Goldman Sachs (GS) or its employees in a financial fraud probe.
In a written statement, the department said it conducted an exhaustive investigation of allegations brought to light by a Senate panel investigating the 2008-2009 financial crisis.
"The department and investigative agencies ultimately concluded that the burden of proof to bring a criminal case could not be met based on the law and facts as they exist at this time," the department said.
But the department added that if additional or new evidence were to emerge, it could reach a different conclusion about prosecuting Goldman if warranted.
Goldman dodges SEC bullet over bum mortgage deal
Justice Department running out of excuses about Wall Street
Feds finally find financial fraud cases small enough to prosecute
A Senate subcommittee chaired by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., in April 2011 found that Goldman marketed four sets of complex mortgage securities to banks and other investors but that the firm failed to tell clients that the securities were very risky. The Senate panel said Goldman secretly bet against the investors' positions and deceived the investors about its own positions to shift risk from its balance sheet to theirs.
The Justice Department's decision capped a good day for Goldman as the Securities and Exchange Commission decided not to file charges against the firm over a $1.3 billion subprime mortgage portfolio. At the same time, the Justice Department's decision ensured that the Obama administration will continue to feel political heat, particularly from the liberal wing of the president's own party, for not having brought more prosecutions in the financial crisis.
The Senate panel probe turned up company emails showing Goldman employees deriding complex mortgage securities sold to banks and other investors as "junk" and "crap."
Levin said during his subcommittee's investigation that he believed that Goldman executives "misled the Congress" and that Goldman "gained at the expense of their clients and they used abusive practices to do it."
Levin questioned the accuracy of testimony Goldman Sachs executives gave to Congress about whether the firm steered investors toward mortgage securities it knew likely would fail.
Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein told the Senate panel that the company didn't bet against its clients and couldn't survive without their trust. The company lost $1.2 billion in the mortgage meltdown in 2007 and 2008 that touched off the financial crisis and the worst recession since the 1930s, Blankfein testified. He also insisted that Goldman wasn't making an aggressive negative bet or short sale on the mortgage market's slide.
In 2010, Goldman agreed to pay $550 million to settle civil fraud charges by the SEC of misleading buyers of mortgage-related securities. The agreement applied to one of the four deals cited by the Senate subcommittee.
The Justice Department said it would aggressively pursue investigations of "matters affecting our financial system."
The department pointed to its probe into the manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate. Britain's Barclays bank admitted in June that it had submitted false information to keep the rate low. Barclays was fined $453 million in settlements with the Justice Department, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and British regulators.
LIBOR, as it is known, is the interest rate that banks charge each other for short-term loans. It is used as the benchmark for bank rates all over the world.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Why geniuses don't have jobs
- Chrysler agrees to recall of Jeeps at risk of fire
- Chrysler expected to make Jeep recall refusal official
- NSA-style spying has been around for years
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- The Internship: 6 real-life lessons from the movie
- What questions should you ask at a job interview?
They bet against their clients, they told them they were the best bundles when they were the worst and then hedged against their failure. That is a matter of record.
---
Starting when?
Do we have a big enough pair of clown-shoes for the Govt. to wear?
The off shot of things like this, for me anyway, is that every single time I see an advertisement from any of the Wall Street Banking or investment companies on TV like Goldman Sachs and the like, is that I extend my arm out towards the TV and raise my middle finger and give them the middle class salute.
...and vow to never give them a penny of my money ever again.
Yup, I give them a hardy @@#$-You, every time I see one of their ads. Same for the National Ass. of Realtors too. Screw all of them.
Until I see them put back the Glass-Steagall Act and tear down Gramm-Leach-Bliley and strike down the cute little lines that allow them to circumvent state bucket shop laws and do unlimited side betting....
I will salute you all.
They'd have to get real jobs with the same kind of benefits the rest of us are getting: Nothing.
Politicians know what side of the bread is buttered and by whom. It hasn't been by the American people for 30 years or more.