AP/ July 13, 2012, 5:53 PM

Banks, card companies to pay retailers at least $6B

(AP) NEW YORK - Visa (V), MasterCard (MA) and major banks agreed to pay retailers at least $6 billion to settle a long-running lawsuit that alleged the card issuers conspired to fix the fees that stores pay to accept credit cards. As part of the settlement, announced Friday, stores from Rite Aid (RAD) to Kroger (KR) will be allowed to charge customers more if they pay using a credit card.

The pact, which is being called by lawyers involved in the case the largest antitrust settlement in U.S. history, is seen as a major victory for merchants that have long complained about the billions of dollars in so-called "swipe" or "interchange" fees that they pay to banks for purchases made using plastic. But at a time when shoppers increasingly are using credit and debit cards, merchants will face a dilemma: Whether to charge shoppers extra for using plastic, and if so, how to do so without angering them.

Why cash is losing its currency
ID theft: Feds sue Wyndham Hotels
New security problem for credit and debit cards

Marilyn Landis, who was last year's chairman of the National Small Business Association, said that the settlement is a victory for small businesses across the country because it could ultimately lead to banks lowering the fees they charge stores for customers' credit card purchases.

Landis, who owns Pittsburgh-based financial services firm Basic Business Concepts, said that would be a big relief. She's now paying 3.75 percent each time a customer pays with a credit card. If bank card companies reduce the fees they charge her to 2.75 percent, she would save a dollar on every $100 in sales.

"That's huge," she said.

According to the National Retail Federation, the nation's largest retail group, swipe fees costs for stores total about $30 billion per year. Mallory Duncan, senior vice president and general counsel for the group, said the settlement is a step in the right direction.

"What we need are changes in the rules that bring about transparency and competition that would be here for years to come," he said.

The dispute between stores and banks dates back to 2005. That's when large retailers, including Kroger Co., Safeway Inc. (SWY) and Walgreen Co. (WAG) began filing price-fixing lawsuits against Visa, MasterCard and other banks.

The retailers claimed the credit card issuers worked together to fix the fees that stores pay to accept credit and debit cards. The fees, which vary depending on the type of store and the type of card issues, average about 2 percent of the price of a purchase.

Visa and MasterCard make money on the fees that stores pay for each customer that uses credit or debit cards for their purchases. The fees are set by card processing networks but collected by, and split with, the banks that issue the cards.

The card companies long have defended the fees they charge stores. They say stores benefit from being able to accept credit and debit cards from customers, who often spend more when they're using plastic instead of cash or checks.

Retailers fought to charge customers who use plastic for their purchases extra. They've argued that the ability to charge customers who use plastic more for their purchases would reduce their costs for accepting the cards.

But up until now, Visa and MasterCard have banned stores from charging customers who use credit cards more. Merchants, however, have been allowed to offer customers discounts if they pay with cash. Some gas stations do this, for example.

As part of the settlement, credit card companies have agreed to reduce swipe fees for eight months. The temporary reprieve on fees is valued at $1.2 billion. The settlement does not apply to debit cards, which have grown in popularity for small-value transactions.

"These new rules will give merchants the tools they need to put pressure on the credit card networks to lower interchange or swipe fees, which are the second-or third-highest cost of doing business for many retailers," said Patrick J. Coughlin, senior trial counsel at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, and one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs.

Joseph W. Saunders, chairman and chief executive of Visa Inc., said in a statement Friday that he's comfortable with the agreement, which he believes will not affect the company's earnings outlook.

"We believe settling this case is in the best interests of all parties," he said.

Noah Hanft, MasterCard Inc.'s general counsel, said in a separate statement on Friday that the decision to settle "was based on our belief that MasterCard and our stakeholders are best served by an amicable resolution."

"Although we have strong defenses to all claims, a settlement avoids years of litigation and uncertainties that are inherent in such cases," he said. "We believe that today's settlements should resolve all issues with the merchant community."

Visa and MasterCard stock both jumped in after-hours trading. Visa climbed 2.8 percent, and MasterCard rose 3.7 percent.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dman6015 says:
Not only will retailers get $6 Billion from Visa/Mastercard, the agreement opens up the ability for retailers to add on a service charge EVERY TIME you use a credit/debit card. With no limit on how much the service charges can be. In caving in to retailer demands, they just allowed a new cash-cow revenue stream for retailers. Get ready to dig deeper!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Void-Master says:
by SayWhaaaaaat July 15, 2012 10:05 AM EDT

Yeah if you want to get robbed. Imagine going to an electronic store to buy a television at 1k...if i was a thief, i would just sit in the parking lot and frisk everyone who passed by. Yeah its a good thing.

***

If you're that worried about muggers, carry a gun. A mugger can take your credit card just as easily as one can take your cash. Meanwhile, you'll notice there's not a big problem with thieves hanging around in parking lots, staking out big-ticket item stores. Generally it's called parking lot security. And I think you'll find that most big-ticket item stores have some.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
endrepubs says:
I guess Cash is still King! Merchants just love cash.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jechaucer says:
I use a credit card often, but I am not in debt. Sure cash is nice to use, but how many people really keep a few hundred dollars on them. I use have fifty bucks or less in cash on me at any time. The credit card is nice if I'm in a store and see something I want or need that may cost a couple of hundred dollars. Now with this new ruling, it seems the merchants can charge me more for using the card. So now I have to go to an ATM and get cash. If it's not a bank I belong I could be hit with fees up to $5.00. Face it folks, in the end, the consumer loses again.
reply
1notrub11 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed. I also can agree with jaykay below. Its all about discipline. There are two reasons I use cards: for large cost purchases and to access benefits (such as cash returned). I don't buy things I don't need or can't afford but do use cards to pay for gas, eating out, etc. Even with card purchases, I look for bargains.
This, however, may change that. The "new role" that cash presents now, will cause an increase in the number of store specific bargain cards to differentiate between cash and charge. Prices will effectively rise.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Void-Master says:
If this leads to more people using cash, it's a good thing.
reply
SayWhaaaaaat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yeah if you want to get robbed. Imagine going to an electronic store to buy a television at 1k...if i was a thief, i would just sit in the parking lot and frisk everyone who passed by. Yeah its a good thing.
jaykay3141 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I guess sooner or later the Treasury will have to print $200 and $500 bills.

There are places in the EU where swipe fees are outrageous. The last time I was in Germany some stores were charging 8-10% more for credit than for cash. It was certainly not thrilling to have to keep a couple of hundred euros in my pocket.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mobncob says:
To TheKritik, you are not part of the settlement. It just means that you will pay more in bank fees, and the retailers will increase their profits. As usual, the consumer loses.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TJphoto says:
"There is no need for more financial regulation, on the contrary, we need less to make this economy grow". Mitt Romney 2012
reply
ugacrew replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's right Mr. Romney, I guess you feel the same way about the IRS and its tax codes.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RangerDan107 says:
I see a new multi-billion dollar settlement with a bank almost daily. Now, if we could only see some of these criminals being led away in shackles I would be thrilled. Bank thugs continue to conspire as they please, and the only price is the billions of dollars in profits being taken away from the stockholders. I guess until stockholders get a conscience and start holding these money ***** CEO's accountable for their bad behavior nothing will change. Anybody questioning why America is in decline need only look at this behavior.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TheKritik says:
where can i sign up to get my part of the settlement :-)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hlmelsaidtwitter says:
Dispute since 2005 about card fees.
reply
See all 14 Comments