HP laying off 27,000 workers in restructuring

AP
(AP) SAN FRANCISCO - Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ) plans to cut 27,000 jobs as the growing popularity of smartphones, the iPad and other mobile devices makes it tougher for the company to sell personal computers.
The cuts announced Wednesday represent HP's largest payroll purge in its 73-year history. The reductions will affect about 8 percent of HP's nearly 350,000 employees by the time the overhaul is completed in October 2014.
Word of the mass layoff had leaked out in media reports late last week, so the news didn't come as a surprise.
HP hopes to avoid as many layoffs as possible by offering early retirement packages.
The company, which is based in Palo Alto, Calif., expects to save as much as $3.5 billion annually from the job cuts and other austerity measures.
HP CEO Meg Whitman plans to funnel most of the savings into developing more products and services that could help the company adapt to technological shifts. Those changes are driving demand for more mobile computing and for software that is provided over high-speed Internet connections, rather than installed on individual computers.
Investors seemed to be delighted with the shake-up. HP's shares surged $2.42, or more than 11 percent, to $23.50 in extended trading Wednesday after the announcement.
"Work force reductions are never easy," Whitman said in a conference call Wednesday with analysts. "They adversely impact people's lives, but in this case, they are absolutely critical to the long-term health of the company. Our goal is simple: a better outcome for the customers at reduced cost for HP."
Whitman's crackdown will immediately change the leaders within HP's recently acquired Autonomy division, which makes software for searching for information within companies and government agencies.
Bill Veghte, HP's chief strategy officer, is replacing Autonomy founder Mike Lynch in an effort to boost the division's financial performance. The shake-up is likely to amplify investor questions about whether HP blundered last year when it paid $11 billion to buy Autonomy. That deal was announced in August by Whitman's predecessor, Leo Apotheker, just a month before he was fired.
News of the cutbacks overshadowed the release of HP's latest quarterly results.
The company earned $1.6 billion, or 80 cent per share, during the three months ending in April, its fiscal second quarter. That represented a 31 percent decline from $2.3 billion, or $1.05 per share, at the same time last year.
If not for several items unrelated to HP's ongoing business, the company said it would have earned 98 cents per share. That figure topped the average estimate of 91 cents per share among analysts surveyed by FactSet.
Revenue for HP's fiscal second quarter fell 3 percent from last year to $30.7 billion. That was about $800 million above analyst projections.
"I wouldn't say we have turned the corner, but we are making progress," Whitman told analysts.
To pay for severance and other restructuring costs, HP expects to take a pre-tax charge of about $1.7 billion in the current fiscal year, which ends in October. It expects to take charges of an additional $1.8 billion through fiscal 2014.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- How to stop the mediocrity pandemic
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Top five 529 college plans
- LinkedIn: 3 tips for building a better profile
- Apple's Cook says company doesn't use "tax gimmicks" 65 Comments
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Making your smartphone battery last longer
- How to organize your job hunt














correction
The HP layoffs are a good example of why we should all be working for the government. The government does not have to produce anything to sell and your job isn't dependent upon the sale of products. As long as goverment can keep raising taxes, your job is safe. At least, that is what the citizens of Greece thought and look at their economy.
-------------------
I think what's sorely needed in the United States of America is HOW MUCH the private sector depends on the taxpayer and BIG government. The private sector depends so much on BIG government that it has one up on the people on a global scale with BIG GOVERNMENT unions designed for the phony pick yourself up by your own bootstraps private sector. These unions are known as NAFTA, CAFTA and GAFTA.
The private sector saddled with the corporate legal construct creates a huge threat to democracy as corporations run more like Mubarak's dictatorship instead of like systems that represent the interests of the greater percentage of the population.
HP stumbled because they did not release a tablet that ran Android. Instead they pushed WebOS which died and are pushing Windows 7 on a tablet. Who the heck wants that?
Customers are buying Android tablets they are not buying Windows tablets. HP hitched it's star to Microsoft and got screwed like dozens of other companies before them.
HP also misread the market and didn't realize that consumer purchasing of PCs was going to tank during the Great Recession. Business purchasing held the industry up.
HP makes top of the line servers. Their laptop line is iffy - some are good, some are bad. I'm typing this on a Pavilion g7 which worked much better once I kicked it from 4 to 8GB of ram. And their desktop line is really no better than any other name-brand desktop.
What HP needs in the PC realm is to concentrate on the basics of customer satisfaction and making products that people are buying from others - like Android tablets.
----------------------------------------
this must explain apple's failings as well.
The HP layoffs are a good example of why we should all be working for the government. The government does not have to produce anything to sell and your job isn't dependent upon the sale of products. As long as goverment can keep raising taxes, your job is safe. At least, that is what the citizens of Greece thought and look at their economy.
What a lovely word for "screwing over 27,0000 loyal employees and their families"?
I'm sure the executives that made the decisions leading to the loss of profitability (the same ones that make 100 times the salary of the common employee) leading to the "restructuring" are safe or are getting a lovely golden handshake.
Bring in one of you unqualified members of the millionaire's club, give them a huge salary and let them drive the company into a trainwreck. When they fail you just layoff the middle class workers and everything is good again, at least for the CEO.
The quality of their products dropped as a result, as well. I used to purchase HP exclusively, but stopped when they went downhill on product quality.