July 7, 2009 4:56 PM
- Text
Physicians Strike Back At Employers' Collection Firms
(MoneyWatch) As healthcare becomes more expensive, self-insured employers are ratcheting up the pressure on physicians by hiring outside collection firms to dun them for what the employers claim are past overpayments. Physicians are angry about these ex post facto demands, which often concern claims that were paid years ago, and they have enlisted their medical societies to fight the companies that are doing this.
In the most recent clash, the Tennessee Medical Association has sued Health Research Insights (HRI), a Franklin, TN-based firm that has sent collection letters to physicians in Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee and Texas. Other defendants in the suit include the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TN, and Nashville's Board of Education, which runs a self-insured plan for school employees. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee, the plan's administrator, is also named in the suit, although the insurer disavows any relationship with the collection firm.
The suit, which alleges fraud, says that HRI keeps 40 percent of whatever it collects. The TMA wants a court to enjoin HRI from making any further efforts to collect from physicians. An earlier protest by the Georgia Medical Society against HRI's work on behalf of Georgia Pacific led to a suspension of those activities.
Health plans audit physicians and may force them to return overpayments. But most states have limits on how far back the insurers can go. Self-insured employers, which are governed by the federal ERISA law, have no such limits.
While HRI is said to be using employers' claims data as the basis for determining that some physicians were overpaid, other collection firms sometimes demand medical records from doctors. Consultants and attorneys say that these documents are frequently related to services that physicians provided when the self-insured employer had a different plan administrator. The privacy provisions of the HIPAA law allow the employer to see the records, although physicians can refused to provide them.
This battle over payments is yet another consequence of the patchwork quilt that we call a healthcare system. With dual regulations governing self-insured and fully insured plans, as well as public and private forms of insurance, it's a wonder that anybody can even understand what's going on, let alone make it work. It will be interesting to see how Congress addresses ERISA in its healthcare reforms. If the feds take over insurance regulation from the states, it's hard to see why self-insured employers should be treated differently than anybody else.
In the most recent clash, the Tennessee Medical Association has sued Health Research Insights (HRI), a Franklin, TN-based firm that has sent collection letters to physicians in Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee and Texas. Other defendants in the suit include the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TN, and Nashville's Board of Education, which runs a self-insured plan for school employees. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee, the plan's administrator, is also named in the suit, although the insurer disavows any relationship with the collection firm.
The suit, which alleges fraud, says that HRI keeps 40 percent of whatever it collects. The TMA wants a court to enjoin HRI from making any further efforts to collect from physicians. An earlier protest by the Georgia Medical Society against HRI's work on behalf of Georgia Pacific led to a suspension of those activities.
Health plans audit physicians and may force them to return overpayments. But most states have limits on how far back the insurers can go. Self-insured employers, which are governed by the federal ERISA law, have no such limits.
While HRI is said to be using employers' claims data as the basis for determining that some physicians were overpaid, other collection firms sometimes demand medical records from doctors. Consultants and attorneys say that these documents are frequently related to services that physicians provided when the self-insured employer had a different plan administrator. The privacy provisions of the HIPAA law allow the employer to see the records, although physicians can refused to provide them.
This battle over payments is yet another consequence of the patchwork quilt that we call a healthcare system. With dual regulations governing self-insured and fully insured plans, as well as public and private forms of insurance, it's a wonder that anybody can even understand what's going on, let alone make it work. It will be interesting to see how Congress addresses ERISA in its healthcare reforms. If the feds take over insurance regulation from the states, it's hard to see why self-insured employers should be treated differently than anybody else.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Oil below $100 amid signs of improving US economy
- Sinking
- Rep. Bachus faces insider-trading investigation
- Singapore DBS bank profit jumps 7.8 percent in 4Q
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






