November 19, 2009 4:27 PM
- Text
The New AOL: A Lean, Mean Byting Machine
(MoneyWatch)
Just when you thought there wasn't any one left to fire, AOL has told employees that it was looking for a mere 2,500 people to take a package and leave the company, representing a third of its workforce. Maybe, that seems like a strange way to go about things. Surely, there must be some deadwood among what, as of right now, is a total of more than 7,000 employees? Maybe that's so, but there are two reasons why AOL is not slashing and burning, even at a moment like this:
1. Even before the arrival of chairman-CEO Tim Armstrong earlier this year from Google, AOL has already suffered hundreds upon hundreds of layoffs -- the most recent, a flesh wound of about 100 people, coming just last week. The people that were, all things considered, easy to fire, have already gone. (Business Insider has a different take on this -- that the voluntary layoffs allow a lot of high-priced senior vps to leave and save face -- but I'm sticking by my speculation.)
2. Armstrong has gone about the cost-cutting process in a way that can only be described as Googl-y. His email to employees about the layoffs espouses an "Employees First" motto. Before today, this expressed itself in some highly participatory company initiatives, such as Project Everest, aimed at examining cost structures throughout AOL. Rather than being one of those top-down affairs, management has drawn on people throughout the company to bring their insights to the table.
The decision to pursue voluntary layoffs expresses "Employees First" in a different way, since, as Armstrong said in the memo, it's as "an option that gives people more choice and decision-making ability instead of waiting for the final cost recommendations and involuntary layoffs." Sad, but true. (BTW, Armstrong has decided to forego his 2009 bonus, of at least $1.4 million.)
One thing these layoffs probably won't mean is the end of AOL's attempt at creating quality journalism for the Web, though one of my colleagues and I wondered about that earlier in the day. For one, if Armstrong is to leverage his strategy of creating premium advertising inventory, he needs premium content to go with it. And second, the journalists the company has hired are the last people in the organization that would be likely to take a voluntary buyout. They all know that, relatively speaking, AOL is a safe haven.
The layoffs are among a number of steps the company is taking to streamline as it spins off from Time Warner. These, courtesy of the folks at AllThingsD, also include selling ICQ, the instant messaging service that even before AOL's own AIM, once ruled the world and Mapquest, now an also-ran in the mapping wars.
Just when you thought there wasn't any one left to fire, AOL has told employees that it was looking for a mere 2,500 people to take a package and leave the company, representing a third of its workforce. Maybe, that seems like a strange way to go about things. Surely, there must be some deadwood among what, as of right now, is a total of more than 7,000 employees? Maybe that's so, but there are two reasons why AOL is not slashing and burning, even at a moment like this:1. Even before the arrival of chairman-CEO Tim Armstrong earlier this year from Google, AOL has already suffered hundreds upon hundreds of layoffs -- the most recent, a flesh wound of about 100 people, coming just last week. The people that were, all things considered, easy to fire, have already gone. (Business Insider has a different take on this -- that the voluntary layoffs allow a lot of high-priced senior vps to leave and save face -- but I'm sticking by my speculation.)
2. Armstrong has gone about the cost-cutting process in a way that can only be described as Googl-y. His email to employees about the layoffs espouses an "Employees First" motto. Before today, this expressed itself in some highly participatory company initiatives, such as Project Everest, aimed at examining cost structures throughout AOL. Rather than being one of those top-down affairs, management has drawn on people throughout the company to bring their insights to the table.
The decision to pursue voluntary layoffs expresses "Employees First" in a different way, since, as Armstrong said in the memo, it's as "an option that gives people more choice and decision-making ability instead of waiting for the final cost recommendations and involuntary layoffs." Sad, but true. (BTW, Armstrong has decided to forego his 2009 bonus, of at least $1.4 million.)
One thing these layoffs probably won't mean is the end of AOL's attempt at creating quality journalism for the Web, though one of my colleagues and I wondered about that earlier in the day. For one, if Armstrong is to leverage his strategy of creating premium advertising inventory, he needs premium content to go with it. And second, the journalists the company has hired are the last people in the organization that would be likely to take a voluntary buyout. They all know that, relatively speaking, AOL is a safe haven.
The layoffs are among a number of steps the company is taking to streamline as it spins off from Time Warner. These, courtesy of the folks at AllThingsD, also include selling ICQ, the instant messaging service that even before AOL's own AIM, once ruled the world and Mapquest, now an also-ran in the mapping wars.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Pakistan army tries 5 officers over extremist ties
- Thousands march against nuclear power in Japan
- Harper says China will lend panda pair to Canada
- Myanmar's Suu Kyi campaigns for parliament
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






