June 12, 2009 11:12 AM
- Text
Facebook Turns Back on Making Money ... Again
(MoneyWatch)
You may have read in the last few days that as of 12:01 a.m. Saturday, Facebook will allow Facebook users to secure their username URLs, so that, for instance, yours truly, might lay claim to facebook.com/catharineptaylor, instead of what it is now, which is facebook.com/(some indistinguishable set of numbers).
Valuable to those who want them, right? Right! With that in mind, people at least as wise at myself, like the folks over at Silicon Alley Insider, thought that maybe Facebook, should, like, charge a small fee for those names, maybe $5/year. (Pro-rated that comes to the 1 1/3 pennies per day.) Then, Silicon Alley Insider finds out that Facebook actually considered auctioning usernames, but it decided not to. As Silicon Alley Insider points out, this could've been great. Most of us rank-and-file types would have paid a very small sum for our names, while advertisers with usernames for pages they'd like to secure would have likely paid quite a bit to own a simpler username for their Facebook domain.
The above is yet another example of Facebook turning down an opportunity to actually make money -- and this refusal to turn into a for-profit business is becoming so routine I'm beginning to wonder if the company has developed a pathological fear of asking others to pay money for the considerable value they are getting from Facebook. It's not just users: Facebook doesn't get anything, neither a cut of ad revenue, nor a licensing fee, in exchange for letting other Web sites use Facebook Connect; it has an underdeveloped ad model, in part because it would never consider doing a MySpace by plastering ads all over the place. (On that one, I'm in agreement.)
The pattern here is disturbing, because every time Facebook unleashes something new but refuses to charge for it, it sets a precedent: that the cost of it is free. As the newspaper industry well knows, once that genie is out of the bottle, it is nigh impossible to stuff it back in. Wake up, Facebook. Stop letting your revenue opportunities slip away.
Previous coverage of Facebook on BNET Media:
You may have read in the last few days that as of 12:01 a.m. Saturday, Facebook will allow Facebook users to secure their username URLs, so that, for instance, yours truly, might lay claim to facebook.com/catharineptaylor, instead of what it is now, which is facebook.com/(some indistinguishable set of numbers).Valuable to those who want them, right? Right! With that in mind, people at least as wise at myself, like the folks over at Silicon Alley Insider, thought that maybe Facebook, should, like, charge a small fee for those names, maybe $5/year. (Pro-rated that comes to the 1 1/3 pennies per day.) Then, Silicon Alley Insider finds out that Facebook actually considered auctioning usernames, but it decided not to. As Silicon Alley Insider points out, this could've been great. Most of us rank-and-file types would have paid a very small sum for our names, while advertisers with usernames for pages they'd like to secure would have likely paid quite a bit to own a simpler username for their Facebook domain.
The above is yet another example of Facebook turning down an opportunity to actually make money -- and this refusal to turn into a for-profit business is becoming so routine I'm beginning to wonder if the company has developed a pathological fear of asking others to pay money for the considerable value they are getting from Facebook. It's not just users: Facebook doesn't get anything, neither a cut of ad revenue, nor a licensing fee, in exchange for letting other Web sites use Facebook Connect; it has an underdeveloped ad model, in part because it would never consider doing a MySpace by plastering ads all over the place. (On that one, I'm in agreement.)
The pattern here is disturbing, because every time Facebook unleashes something new but refuses to charge for it, it sets a precedent: that the cost of it is free. As the newspaper industry well knows, once that genie is out of the bottle, it is nigh impossible to stuff it back in. Wake up, Facebook. Stop letting your revenue opportunities slip away.
Previous coverage of Facebook on BNET Media:
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Heels so high, sometimes the models fall down
- La Scala dancers deny anorexia emergency
- Heels so high, sometimes the models fall down
- La Scala dancers deny anorexia emergency
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






