May 29, 2009 2:59 PM
- Text
Seven (Often Stupid) Reasons Hulu Doesn't Have More Ads
(MoneyWatch)
Been meaning to link all week to a feature story in Adweek about Hulu, the most exhaustive 3000 words I've yet seen on the site's popularity -- and ad model problems. As I've noted in previous posts, given the site's standing as the second most popular video site, and as the go-to provider for video content advertisers are comfortable with, it's astounding just how many public service ads the site runs, even within its most popular content. The story looks at this problem from every perspective possible. I've bullet-pointed seven reasons for it below, but let's just say that if advertisers and Hulu can find a way not to monetize the site, they sure go for it. Here we go:
Been meaning to link all week to a feature story in Adweek about Hulu, the most exhaustive 3000 words I've yet seen on the site's popularity -- and ad model problems. As I've noted in previous posts, given the site's standing as the second most popular video site, and as the go-to provider for video content advertisers are comfortable with, it's astounding just how many public service ads the site runs, even within its most popular content. The story looks at this problem from every perspective possible. I've bullet-pointed seven reasons for it below, but let's just say that if advertisers and Hulu can find a way not to monetize the site, they sure go for it. Here we go:
- Hulu was not expecting the 40 percent traffic surge that happened after the highly popular Alec Baldwin "Alien" ad aired on the Super Bowl, which upped the supply of inventory.
- There's an excess supply of broadcast inventory due to the recession, which has made broadcast a cheaper option than it has been in some years, taking away potential dollars from Hulu.
- Media buying agencies are set up to buy and profit from buying big globs of audience, and, even if the content on Hulu is often exactly what you'd find on broadcast, they don't buy that way.
- The site's owners -- which include NBC, Fox and Disney -- are intentionally holding inventory back for fear it will hurt the prices they can charge for broadcast. As one of those infamous unnamed sources explains: "They'll give up an additional $20-50 million in ad revenue rather than get the model wrong and cannibalize themselves."
- The CPMs (cost-per-thousand) Hulu charges are too high, equal to, or surpassing, those of network TV.
- Many advertisers have production issues. Either they don't have the rights to take a TV spot (which is ludicrous in this day and age) and put it on a digital platform, or they can't make the costs work of doing Internet-only video content, since those audiences are smaller.
- Though Hulu can tell advertisers many things about how their ads performed on Hulu, they don't break out data to tell them what program their ads appeared on.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- UK launches major tourism campaign
- Oscar statues fly from Chicago to Los Angeles
- Study: Charleston gets fraction of cruise impact
- Group take aims at Grand Canyon development vote
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






