March 17, 2011 3:10 PM
- Text
O'Hare, Airlines Both Win as Feds Waste Money on an Expensive Expansion Project
The fight between Chicago's O'Hare airport and its airlines has come to a happy resolution. Who won? Both of them did, now that the federal government has decided to throw money at the problem. I know the administration is big on infrastructure projects, but this one seems like a waste of resources.You may recall that the airport wanted to go ahead with its expansion plans while the two biggest airlines at the airport -- American (AMR) and United (UAL) -- wanted to put the brakes on. The expansion was already in progress, but the airlines said that the work that had already been done would be enough to fill their needs for the foreseeable future. They didn't want to put more money into a project that was unnecessary now.
The city, however, said that it needed the new project to meet long-run traffic demand. The project was only expected to get more expensive, so why not do it now? The feds stepped in to arbitrate.
But instead of arbitrating, it looks like the feds fell for the oldest trick in the book. They've decided that instead of helping find a way for the city and airlines to do this responsibly, they would just throw some money into the pot to make it happen.
On top of the more than $1 billion already into the pot from the feds, another $155 million was thrown into the mix by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, someone with deep Illinois ties. This helped convince the airlines to agree to the issuance of new bonds. But all is not done. Plans for one more runway and a runway extension remain to be finalized. Those negotiations will be extended until 2013, long after Mayor Richard Daley has left office with his "legacy" of modernizing O'Hare secure. The rest of the expansion will be someone else's problem.
In the long run, I'm sure a new runway will benefit the city of Chicago, but did we need the feds to throw in an extra $155 million to make it happen now? It's just a drop in the bucket, for sure, but it's also an unnecessary investment.
Related:
- Airlines vs. Airports: United and American Balk at O'Hare Modernization
- Who Will Fill Delta's Space at Chicago/O'Hare?
- FAA Lifts Chicago/O'Hare's Flight Caps This Fall
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in MoneyWatch
- Trump overshadows Romney with 'birther' talk
- Report: Zuckerberg drops off 40 richest list
- 10 Best Countries To Live and Work Abroad
- What are the most dangerous websites?
- Facebook shares close at new low
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 Cities for Single Men
- The 7 Interview Questions You Must Ask
- Used Cars: 5 to Avoid (and 5 Better Alternatives)
- How to craft an email that gets a reply
- Average home prices hit mid-2002 levels
- 5 reasons to invest in a 529 plan
- The new rules on dressing for success
- Reverse Cell Phone Lookup Service is Free and Simple
- Why leaders should scowl
- What happens to BlackBerry users if RIM tanks?






