November 22, 2010 8:58 AM
- Text
Qantas A380: Now We Know Why the Planes Were Grounded -- and It's Scary
(MoneyWatch)
When I first wrote about the Qantas A380 engine failure, I knew there had to be more to the story. Airlines don't just ground airplanes because an engine fails. Now that more information is being released, we know that the jetliner suffered substantial damage from the engine failure. In fact, had one or two other things gone wrong, that airplane might not have landed.
When the Rolls-Royce (RYCEY) Trent 900 engine failed on the A380, it spewed out parts in all directions. While some fell harmlessly to the ground, others shot up. Some of the debris punctured the wing spar, which is the main structural element of the wing. This caused the gaping hole that passengers saw in the top of the wing from onboard the airplane.
The crew was bombarded by dozens of error messages following the failure, some more important than others. For example, two of the fuel tanks on the airplane were punctured and began to leak highly-flammable fuel. Worse, fuel couldn't be dumped, nor could it be transferred between tanks as usual. So as it leaked out, the plane grew tail-heavy, making it very difficult to control.
Multiple system failures
But that wasn't all. Hydraulics control the maneuverability of the plane and one of the two systems was cut. This meant that enough of the systems were available to land the airplane -- but just barely. Other cables were cut, and the other engine on the wing next to the failed one couldn't be shut down. It was controllable, but the pilots couldn't turn it off.
Considering everything that happened, it could have been much worse. When that engine exploded, it could have punctured a fuel tank in the wing, not just the spar. Had that happened, it's far more likely that there could have been some sort of explosion to bring down the airplane.
As is always the case in accidents, several things have to go wrong for disaster to result. While several things did go wrong on the A380, these particular events fortunately didn't combine to bring the airplane down. But you can certainly now understand why Qantas is grounding this airplane. Since this is a known issue (thanks, Rolls-Royce) that could cause a repeat performance, there's no sense in taking the risk. When the fix is made, the airplane should be safe, but now it's unclear how long it's going to take.
Related:
When I first wrote about the Qantas A380 engine failure, I knew there had to be more to the story. Airlines don't just ground airplanes because an engine fails. Now that more information is being released, we know that the jetliner suffered substantial damage from the engine failure. In fact, had one or two other things gone wrong, that airplane might not have landed.When the Rolls-Royce (RYCEY) Trent 900 engine failed on the A380, it spewed out parts in all directions. While some fell harmlessly to the ground, others shot up. Some of the debris punctured the wing spar, which is the main structural element of the wing. This caused the gaping hole that passengers saw in the top of the wing from onboard the airplane.
The crew was bombarded by dozens of error messages following the failure, some more important than others. For example, two of the fuel tanks on the airplane were punctured and began to leak highly-flammable fuel. Worse, fuel couldn't be dumped, nor could it be transferred between tanks as usual. So as it leaked out, the plane grew tail-heavy, making it very difficult to control.
Multiple system failures
But that wasn't all. Hydraulics control the maneuverability of the plane and one of the two systems was cut. This meant that enough of the systems were available to land the airplane -- but just barely. Other cables were cut, and the other engine on the wing next to the failed one couldn't be shut down. It was controllable, but the pilots couldn't turn it off.
Considering everything that happened, it could have been much worse. When that engine exploded, it could have punctured a fuel tank in the wing, not just the spar. Had that happened, it's far more likely that there could have been some sort of explosion to bring down the airplane.
As is always the case in accidents, several things have to go wrong for disaster to result. While several things did go wrong on the A380, these particular events fortunately didn't combine to bring the airplane down. But you can certainly now understand why Qantas is grounding this airplane. Since this is a known issue (thanks, Rolls-Royce) that could cause a repeat performance, there's no sense in taking the risk. When the fix is made, the airplane should be safe, but now it's unclear how long it's going to take.
Related:
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ask the Experts: Gas Prices
- HP sales miss highlights growth challenges
- HP earnings sink, miss analyst targets
- Microsoft files EU complaint against Motorola, Google
- Why Apple's labor practices may never improve
- Geithner presses case for revamping corporate taxes
- The 10 best places to retire
- How much is your leisure time worth?
- What Uncle Sam can REALLY do for small business owners
- Existing home sales up, inventory down -- for now
- Corporate tax cut: Good idea, but won't stimulate economy
- Generate leads like a management guru
- The Investor Edition: Featuring Allison Goldberg and David S. Rose
- A simple strategy to keep your inbox clean
- Why even great employees get average evaluations
- Fitch downgrades Greece
- Retirement planning inspiration from the Oscars
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Fitness program for mentally ill expands in NH
- Newark mayor seeks probe of NYPD Muslim spying
- Feds crack down on rhino horn smuggling ring
- Philippine official opposes more public holidays
on Facebook
- Six decades of Oscar fashion
- Christie: Buffett should "write a check and shut up"
- "Biggest Loser" contestants reportedly threaten to quit
on CBS News






