August 18, 2009 10:48 AM
- Text
LAX Rent Increase Ruled Not Discriminatory, But Fight Continues
(MoneyWatch) There was interesting ruling out of the appeals courts last week. LAX's efforts to jack up rent for some airlines and not others was ruled to be not discriminatory. But that doesn't mean this fight is over.
LAX is in a strange situation in that some of its terminals are under long terms leases (United and American, for example) while other terminals are not. So, LAX tried to increase its rents where it could and that, of course, meant leaving the rents alone for those terminals under lease.
The airlines facing the rent increase banded together to sue, saying that the increase was discriminatory. The appeals court said that no, it wasn't. But the court also noted that the DOT needs to consider whether the airport has monopoly power and that could impact their ability to increase rates. That's why this fight isn't over yet.
The airlines will, I have to assume, keep fighting. Southwest has said that its rent would jump from less than $5 million a year to more than $20 million. That's a huge increase and it could cause airlines to reduce flights. Airports Council International - North American (ACI-NA) applauded the decision but noted that it's far from over.
LAX is in a strange situation in that some of its terminals are under long terms leases (United and American, for example) while other terminals are not. So, LAX tried to increase its rents where it could and that, of course, meant leaving the rents alone for those terminals under lease.
The airlines facing the rent increase banded together to sue, saying that the increase was discriminatory. The appeals court said that no, it wasn't. But the court also noted that the DOT needs to consider whether the airport has monopoly power and that could impact their ability to increase rates. That's why this fight isn't over yet.
The airlines will, I have to assume, keep fighting. Southwest has said that its rent would jump from less than $5 million a year to more than $20 million. That's a huge increase and it could cause airlines to reduce flights. Airports Council International - North American (ACI-NA) applauded the decision but noted that it's far from over.
We believe it is premature to predict the outcome of the DOT on [whether the alleged use of monopoly power by the airport was relevant to the fee dispute] or any other unresolved issue.So now, we sit and wait.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- EU: Greece must cut deeper to get bailout
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- 2nd deposition sought for convicted Ponzi schemer
- GM gets environmental OK for new China plant
- German Parliament likely to vote on Greece Feb. 27
- France's Total gets oil price profit boost
on Facebook
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- "Person to Person" with George Clooney
on CBS News






