May 6, 2009 11:47 AM
- Text
Continental Shows Weak Numbers, Easter Benefit
(MoneyWatch) Continental's April traffic numbers and revenue estimates are out, and they look slightly better than what we saw in March. Does this mean things have hit a bottom? Maybe, but we need to remember that Easter shifted from March to April this year, and that has a big impact.
Continental actually was able to fill more seats in April this year than last thanks to fewer seats being out there. Their overall load factor was actually up 2.9 points. This held up throughout the airline's route system, so even international was ok, though it required larger capacity cuts (eg, transatlantic down 10 percent).
And while Revenue per Available Seat Mile (RASM) for March officially came in down 19.6 percent, April is expected to be merely down between 12.5 and 13.5 percent year over year. Sounds great, right? Well, sort of, but we have to remember the Easter shift. March of 2008 had Easter while March of 2009 did not, so you would expect there to be a big drop in traffic even if regular demand had held up. It obviously didn't, so the compounded impact was a mess.
April 2008, on the other hand, didn't have Easter but April 2009 did. So any lowered traffic demand would be muted by the natural increase that comes from Easter travel. In other words, there was some noise in both these numbers, so it's important to keep in mind that things aren't as rosy as it may look.
Continental actually was able to fill more seats in April this year than last thanks to fewer seats being out there. Their overall load factor was actually up 2.9 points. This held up throughout the airline's route system, so even international was ok, though it required larger capacity cuts (eg, transatlantic down 10 percent).
And while Revenue per Available Seat Mile (RASM) for March officially came in down 19.6 percent, April is expected to be merely down between 12.5 and 13.5 percent year over year. Sounds great, right? Well, sort of, but we have to remember the Easter shift. March of 2008 had Easter while March of 2009 did not, so you would expect there to be a big drop in traffic even if regular demand had held up. It obviously didn't, so the compounded impact was a mess.
April 2008, on the other hand, didn't have Easter but April 2009 did. So any lowered traffic demand would be muted by the natural increase that comes from Easter travel. In other words, there was some noise in both these numbers, so it's important to keep in mind that things aren't as rosy as it may look.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Man accused of threatening Obama charged again
- NY Fashion Week: Wearable, sellable style for fall
- On the Call: LinkedIn CFO Steve Sordello
- Guilty plea anticipated in NY baby kidnap case
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






