January 28, 2009 7:32 PM
- Text
DOT Denies Virgin America Request for Confidentiality
(MoneyWatch) It was more than six months ago that we last checked in on the Virgin America vs DOT saga. Virgin America had requested confidentiality for its traffic information, lost, and then appealed the decision. The appeal was finally denied today, and the information will be released to the public on "the second business day following the service date." I assume today is the service date, so we should see the information by Friday, just in time for a long weekend of number-crunching.
The DOT dismissed many of Virgin America's arguments under the appeal by saying that they were out of the scope of the original ruling. If Virgin America wants to try to fight this battle against public disclosure on a broader scale, they'll need to propose a Petition for Rulemaking and not use the appeal system.
But on the relevant objections, the department found no merit to the airline's appeal. In fact, to sum things up, I'll see Steven Smith, Deputy Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics take it away:
The DOT dismissed many of Virgin America's arguments under the appeal by saying that they were out of the scope of the original ruling. If Virgin America wants to try to fight this battle against public disclosure on a broader scale, they'll need to propose a Petition for Rulemaking and not use the appeal system.
But on the relevant objections, the department found no merit to the airline's appeal. In fact, to sum things up, I'll see Steven Smith, Deputy Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics take it away:
I have reviewed the appeal of the staff action denying Virgin America's motions for confidential treatment and considered all documents properly filed in DOT Docket OST-2008-0107. I find that Virgin America did not present any additional evidence to demonstrate a likelihood that Virgin America would suffer substantial competitive harm from the release of certain Form 41 financial, traffic, and O&D data submitted to the DOT. Based on my review of the record in Docket 0107, I am affirming the staff action in this matter because I did not find a compelling justification for overturning the original denial of Virgin America's motions for confidential treatment.Bam. Looks like we'll be getting a much better sense of how Virgin America is doing within the next few days.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Sinking
- Rep. Bachus faces insider-trading investigation
- Singapore DBS bank profit jumps 7.8 percent in 4Q
- Owner of Sierra mine surrenders to face charges
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






