December 26, 2008 11:31 AM
- Text
Delta Postpones Raleigh/Durham to Paris Flight
(MoneyWatch) Raleigh-Durham International Airport announced earlier this week that Delta would be postponing its Raleigh/Durham to Paris/Charles de Gaulle flight by one year from summer 2009 to summer 2010. According to Delta, it's because of the economic climate, but something doesn't smell right here.
It was less than two months ago, November 6 to be exact, that Delta announced it would launch a flight from Raleigh/Durham to Paris beginning in summer 2009. Let's think about what has happened since November. Has the economy worsened? Certainly, but there haven't been any big shocks since then.
So when Raleigh/Durham says, "[Delta] indicated that its decision was based upon the current economic climate and not the strength of the market or demand for the service" then I start to wonder. There are only a couple things that could have changed this decision.
The most simple explanation is that they simply found a better use for the airplane, but that's pretty poor form to make changes so rapidly. If that's not the case, maybe a corporate contract backed out. But most companies I know made their travel cuts before November. I suppose it only takes one big one to throw plans off.
If it's neither of those, it's entirely possible that there was just some questionable decision-making in the first place and they've second-guessed themselves. I'm sure there's more to this story.
It was less than two months ago, November 6 to be exact, that Delta announced it would launch a flight from Raleigh/Durham to Paris beginning in summer 2009. Let's think about what has happened since November. Has the economy worsened? Certainly, but there haven't been any big shocks since then.
So when Raleigh/Durham says, "[Delta] indicated that its decision was based upon the current economic climate and not the strength of the market or demand for the service" then I start to wonder. There are only a couple things that could have changed this decision.
The most simple explanation is that they simply found a better use for the airplane, but that's pretty poor form to make changes so rapidly. If that's not the case, maybe a corporate contract backed out. But most companies I know made their travel cuts before November. I suppose it only takes one big one to throw plans off.
If it's neither of those, it's entirely possible that there was just some questionable decision-making in the first place and they've second-guessed themselves. I'm sure there's more to this story.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Rep. Bachus faces insider-trading investigation
- Singapore DBS bank profit jumps 7.8 percent in 4Q
- Owner of Sierra mine surrenders to face charges
- Asia stocks slip as Greek bailout remains in limbo
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






