September 18, 2008 11:05 AM
- Text
Does Spirit Really Have the Best Operating Margin in the US?
(MoneyWatch) Second quarter DOT numbers are out, and I was extremely surprised to see that the airline with the best operating margin in the US during the quarter was . . . Spirit? The airline's 13.5% margin is stellar, and while sources like ATW are taking it at face value, it just doesn't sound right. Let's dig in.
In Q2, Spirit's operating revenues were $206 million, just slightly above the $204.5 million in Q1. So nothing surprising there, but now take a look at operating expenses. In Q2, expenses were $178 million, WAY down from the $206.5 million in Q1. Further down in Schedule B-12, we can see that the decrease came from flight operations - $107 million in Q2 vs $134 million in Q1. So where did that come from?
This required heading over to Schedule P-6, where we can see that the big decrease was in fuel costs. How weird. They paid about $59 million for fuel in Q2 and more than $86 million in Q1, according to the financial filings, but that doesn't jive with the numbers in the Airline Fuel Cost and Consumption chart. Over there, it says they paid more than $106 million in Q2 vs around $83 million in Q1. So what gives?
Clearly, they reduced their fuel costs somehow via one time reductions that were rolled into the fuel line item, but it doesn't reflect how the operation itself was performing. It we double up fuel costs, we can see that the airline lost money, just like many of its peers.
In Q2, Spirit's operating revenues were $206 million, just slightly above the $204.5 million in Q1. So nothing surprising there, but now take a look at operating expenses. In Q2, expenses were $178 million, WAY down from the $206.5 million in Q1. Further down in Schedule B-12, we can see that the decrease came from flight operations - $107 million in Q2 vs $134 million in Q1. So where did that come from?
This required heading over to Schedule P-6, where we can see that the big decrease was in fuel costs. How weird. They paid about $59 million for fuel in Q2 and more than $86 million in Q1, according to the financial filings, but that doesn't jive with the numbers in the Airline Fuel Cost and Consumption chart. Over there, it says they paid more than $106 million in Q2 vs around $83 million in Q1. So what gives?
Clearly, they reduced their fuel costs somehow via one time reductions that were rolled into the fuel line item, but it doesn't reflect how the operation itself was performing. It we double up fuel costs, we can see that the airline lost money, just like many of its peers.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
- Wholesale inventories rose 1 percent in December
- States, Feds to announce new mortgage settlement
- Management changes at Ford
- Unemployment aid applications near a 4-year low
- PepsiCo's net rises; plans to cut 8,700 jobs
- Smartr: A brilliant contacts app for smartphones
- What happens if your insurance company fails?
- Student loan debt: The next financial disaster?
- Investing: Four words that can rob you blind
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Summary Box: Mercedes helps Daimler 4q profit rise
- Latest quarter, view boost Web services co. Akamai
- Marines posed with flag resembling Nazi SS logo
- Pa. fines Chesapeake Energy $565K for violations
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "American Idol": Jim Carrey's daughter out, and then disaster
- Calif. surfer runs fastest-growing camera company
on CBS News






