September 22, 2008 1:54 PM
- Text
Teck Cominco's Oil Sands Costs Jump 50 Percent
(MoneyWatch)
The first phase of the project, expected to begin production in the fourth quarter of 2011, is planned to yield 140,000 barrels per day (b/d) of synthetic crude oil. The company's 20 percent share-net in Fort Hills holds an estimated 700 million barrels of synthetic crude oil equivalent reserves.
Scheduled to come online by 2014, a second phase called for doubling production to a total of 280,000 b/d of synthetic crude oil. Given the latest engineering news on escalating costs for phase one, the preliminary aggregate price tag of $12.1 billion for the mine and upgrading components of the second phase of the project would likely double.
The Question: Could rising construction costs, falling oil prices, and/or turmoil in the credit markets delay -- or lead to a cancellation -- of the entire project, or at least call into question the economic viability of the planned second phase?
The Company: Teck Cominco Limited, a diversified mining company.- The Filing: Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 17, 2008.
- The Finding: Teck Cominco Limited said its share of capital costs for the first phase of the Fort Hills oil sands project, of which it owns a 20 percent working interest, is now pegged at $4.2 billion, up $1.84 billion from an initial June 2007 cost estimate. The tar sands project is a critical component of the metals and mining company's diversification strategy to hedge asset volatility (by moderating exposure to cyclical swings in any given commodity, such as copper or zinc).
The first phase of the project, expected to begin production in the fourth quarter of 2011, is planned to yield 140,000 barrels per day (b/d) of synthetic crude oil. The company's 20 percent share-net in Fort Hills holds an estimated 700 million barrels of synthetic crude oil equivalent reserves.
Scheduled to come online by 2014, a second phase called for doubling production to a total of 280,000 b/d of synthetic crude oil. Given the latest engineering news on escalating costs for phase one, the preliminary aggregate price tag of $12.1 billion for the mine and upgrading components of the second phase of the project would likely double.
The Question: Could rising construction costs, falling oil prices, and/or turmoil in the credit markets delay -- or lead to a cancellation -- of the entire project, or at least call into question the economic viability of the planned second phase?
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Soccer's Richest Clubs List
- Another England soap opera as Fabio Capello quits
- Fabio Capello quits as England coach
- Fabio Capello quits as England coach
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Timothy Dolan: Birth control tweak a "first step"
on CBS News






