June 16, 2009 12:55 PM
- Text
Transportation Bill Unveiled Tomorrow. Here's What to Expect.
(MoneyWatch)
Are we poised to dramatically revamp America's problematic transportation policy? Because of a very well-organized highway lobby, the massive $400 billion bills have tended to favor giant construction projects over public transit and other human-sized innovations.
Congressman Jim Oberstar (D-MN), who oversees transportation issues in the House, seems to have another approach in mind. Oberstar will release a 100-page outline of the new policy in Washington tomorrow morning at 11 a.m. In the meantime, there are clues to his thinking in a two-page handwritten outline he apparently scribbled out recently while flying to College Station, Texas.
Oberstar's plan will strive for what the outline calls "transit equity," changing the formula by which the federal government pays 80 percent of highway projects but only 50 percent of transit ones. The 108 Department of Transportation programs would be consolidated into four major areas focused on reducing congestion, improving air quality, increasing highway safety and a flexible pot of money under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) heading.
The emphasis seems to be on accountability, requiring better data and planning, more performance-based assessments and more equity for transit. There's also a metropolitan mobility program that will allocate money to regions, not just to states. And states would get more self-determination to decide which projects to fund. That would undoubtedly end up funneling money to transit.
James Corless, director of Transportation for America, likes what he sees so far, though the details on public transit aren't yet clear. T 4 America wants to see some strong long-term objectives, including a 40 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from transportation over 20 years, and zero citizen exposure to harmful transport-related air pollution chemicals.
"There ought to be a strong link between the provisions of the Waxman-Markey climate bill and the transportation bill," Corless said. "Historically, they've been separate, but we're trying to make the connection."
Obviously, Congressional special interests will have their knives out. "There are a lot of entrenched interests," Corless said. And how.
Photo: Flickr/Washington State Department of Transportation
Are we poised to dramatically revamp America's problematic transportation policy? Because of a very well-organized highway lobby, the massive $400 billion bills have tended to favor giant construction projects over public transit and other human-sized innovations.Congressman Jim Oberstar (D-MN), who oversees transportation issues in the House, seems to have another approach in mind. Oberstar will release a 100-page outline of the new policy in Washington tomorrow morning at 11 a.m. In the meantime, there are clues to his thinking in a two-page handwritten outline he apparently scribbled out recently while flying to College Station, Texas.
Oberstar's plan will strive for what the outline calls "transit equity," changing the formula by which the federal government pays 80 percent of highway projects but only 50 percent of transit ones. The 108 Department of Transportation programs would be consolidated into four major areas focused on reducing congestion, improving air quality, increasing highway safety and a flexible pot of money under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) heading.
The emphasis seems to be on accountability, requiring better data and planning, more performance-based assessments and more equity for transit. There's also a metropolitan mobility program that will allocate money to regions, not just to states. And states would get more self-determination to decide which projects to fund. That would undoubtedly end up funneling money to transit.
James Corless, director of Transportation for America, likes what he sees so far, though the details on public transit aren't yet clear. T 4 America wants to see some strong long-term objectives, including a 40 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from transportation over 20 years, and zero citizen exposure to harmful transport-related air pollution chemicals.
"There ought to be a strong link between the provisions of the Waxman-Markey climate bill and the transportation bill," Corless said. "Historically, they've been separate, but we're trying to make the connection."
Obviously, Congressional special interests will have their knives out. "There are a lot of entrenched interests," Corless said. And how.
Photo: Flickr/Washington State Department of Transportation
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
- Wholesale inventories rose 1 percent in December
- States, Feds to announce new mortgage settlement
- Management changes at Ford
- Unemployment aid applications near a 4-year low
- PepsiCo's net rises; plans to cut 8,700 jobs
- Smartr: A brilliant contacts app for smartphones
- What happens if your insurance company fails?
- Student loan debt: the next financial disaster?
- Investing: Four words that can rob you blind
- How to get the fastest tax refund
- 10 employee types that drive managers crazy
- How leaders know it's time to quit
- Greece fails to agree terms with EU creditors
- 5 banks in $26B settlement with feds over abuses
- Gas prices continue to creep up
- Joe Coffee | Secrets of Successful Startups
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Pa. House sends major gas-drilling bill to Corbett
- Vt. Senate committee talks power line purchase
- Michigan state workers will avoid furlough days
- US natural gas supplies fell last week
on Facebook
- Calif. surfer runs fastest-growing camera company
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "Person to Person": Bon Jovi behind the scenes
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
on CBS News






