May 7, 2009 5:25 PM
- Text
Yale's Levin, an Obama Advisor, Sees Major Auto Shrinkage
(MoneyWatch)
Richard Levin, president of Yale, is the only economist on the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, which presumably gives his thoughts on the auto industry more than a little weight. And Levin, who was recovering from surgery at presstime and unable to comment further, thinks the industry will shrink. A lot.
In an interview with the Yale Alumni Magazine, Levin foresees the virtual end of national automotive competition. And in the U.S., the Big Three could become--The Big Zero?
"I think the optimum number of U.S. auto companies is one," he said. "Maybe two, but certainly not three. The worldwide auto industry is going to shrink, to a Chinese firm, a Japanese firm, an Indian firm, a Korean firm, a European firm--and an American firm, I hope, but there's a chance there will be zero U.S. auto companies if we don't do this right. There are a lot of assets in America--technological assets, know-how, skills, and labor. But I think a managed reorganization is the right approach. The companies need to shed their legacy costs. The government can offer protection to current workers and retirees."
Richard Levin, president of Yale, is the only economist on the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, which presumably gives his thoughts on the auto industry more than a little weight. And Levin, who was recovering from surgery at presstime and unable to comment further, thinks the industry will shrink. A lot.In an interview with the Yale Alumni Magazine, Levin foresees the virtual end of national automotive competition. And in the U.S., the Big Three could become--The Big Zero?
"I think the optimum number of U.S. auto companies is one," he said. "Maybe two, but certainly not three. The worldwide auto industry is going to shrink, to a Chinese firm, a Japanese firm, an Indian firm, a Korean firm, a European firm--and an American firm, I hope, but there's a chance there will be zero U.S. auto companies if we don't do this right. There are a lot of assets in America--technological assets, know-how, skills, and labor. But I think a managed reorganization is the right approach. The companies need to shed their legacy costs. The government can offer protection to current workers and retirees."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
- Venezuelans: Will Chavez's challenger pose threat?
- Malaysia to deport Saudi accused of prophet insult
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- "Phantom" star sings on "CBS This Morning: Saturday"
on CBS News






