November 5, 2009 11:19 AM
- Text
Fossil Fuel Resource Leader? U.S. is No. 1 in World, Thanks to Coal
(MoneyWatch) The U.S. has the most fossil fuel resources in the world. More than Saudi Arabia. More than Canada, Iran and even Russia, which is nibbling at U.S. heels.
The United States' fossil fuel reserves -- that's oil, natural gas and coal -- come in at 969.7 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE), according to a recent Congressional Research Service report.
Russia has 954.9 billion BOE; followed by China with 465.6 billion BOE; and Saudi Arabia and Iran, both with 311.6 billion BOE, according to the report.
The reason we're No. 1 is because of coal, which makes up the vast majority of our fossil fuel resources at 906 billion BOE.
That's a lot of coal. And as R-Squared Energy blogger Robert Rapier noted in his post, the figures point to the importance coal will play when oil reserves start to seriously deplete.
Which brings us to the general topic of government policy and more specifically, climate-change legislation.
The haggle-fest within Congress over passage of a climate-change bill has centered almost exclusively on cost. Namely, what will cap-and-trade legislation cost consumers, the oil refiner worker, the fossil fuels' industry, the U.S. economy? What will the cost be if efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions fail?
Coal is a cheap and abundant resource in the U.S. It's also the dirtiest, which leaves the country at crossroads.
In the pursuit of energy independence, do we chase the easiest-to-reach, cheapest resource; invest in a cleaner alternative that may be more expensive; or do some combination of both? If we choose an alternative to coal, which one do we go with? Do we put our money into carbon capture and storage in hopes of making coal "clean"?
We know where Warren Buffet has placed his bet: strong rail, cheap coal and expensive oil. Others, especially those less than excited about more coal-fired electricity plants, are going to push for an alternative -- of which there are any number of choices.
And again, we've come back to government policy, which will likely dictate the path the U.S. takes.
Image of coal train by Flickr user Sol Young, CC 2.0
The United States' fossil fuel reserves -- that's oil, natural gas and coal -- come in at 969.7 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE), according to a recent Congressional Research Service report.
Russia has 954.9 billion BOE; followed by China with 465.6 billion BOE; and Saudi Arabia and Iran, both with 311.6 billion BOE, according to the report.The reason we're No. 1 is because of coal, which makes up the vast majority of our fossil fuel resources at 906 billion BOE.
That's a lot of coal. And as R-Squared Energy blogger Robert Rapier noted in his post, the figures point to the importance coal will play when oil reserves start to seriously deplete.
Which brings us to the general topic of government policy and more specifically, climate-change legislation.
The haggle-fest within Congress over passage of a climate-change bill has centered almost exclusively on cost. Namely, what will cap-and-trade legislation cost consumers, the oil refiner worker, the fossil fuels' industry, the U.S. economy? What will the cost be if efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions fail?
Coal is a cheap and abundant resource in the U.S. It's also the dirtiest, which leaves the country at crossroads.
In the pursuit of energy independence, do we chase the easiest-to-reach, cheapest resource; invest in a cleaner alternative that may be more expensive; or do some combination of both? If we choose an alternative to coal, which one do we go with? Do we put our money into carbon capture and storage in hopes of making coal "clean"?
We know where Warren Buffet has placed his bet: strong rail, cheap coal and expensive oil. Others, especially those less than excited about more coal-fired electricity plants, are going to push for an alternative -- of which there are any number of choices.
And again, we've come back to government policy, which will likely dictate the path the U.S. takes.
Image of coal train by Flickr user Sol Young, CC 2.0
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Russians alarmed by rash of teenage suicides
- For pregnant women with cancer, chemo possible
- Socialist leader urges vote for austerity measures
- Lawyer: 6 Austrians were injected with malaria
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Timothy Dolan: Birth control tweak a "first step"
on CBS News






