May 26, 2009 8:31 PM
- Text
Imperial Gives $7.1 Billion Boost to Oil Sands and Exxon
(MoneyWatch) Imperial Oil's approval of its $7.1 billion Kearl Lake project snapped the Canadian oil sands industry out of an investment rut that has plagued it for months and has renewed hopes that the tide of job cuts, project delays and cancellations has turned for good. It's also putting money -- much to the chagrin of some Canadians -- into Exxon's pockets.
It's hard to predict whether Imperial's decision marks the beginning of an oil sands revival. This is what I can predict with some confidence: new jobs and additional money will provide a boost to an economy increasingly reliant on the oil sands business. The question is how long-term that boost will be?
Imperial Oil is controlled by Exxon, which holds 70 percent ownership of the Canadian energy company. Imperial, and Exxon as a result, has already benefited to the tune of C$1 billion because it waited to approve the Kearl Lake project. But the real boon for Exxon won't come for a few more years.
Once all phases have been completed, the Kearl Lake project will mine up to 300,000 barrels a day of bitumen, a sticky, low-grade crude oil. The first phase is expected to produce 110,000 barrels, although Imperial Vice President Randy Broiles said expanded capacity could increase output by 27 percent to 140,000 barrels a day.
The bitumen will be mined, combined with a diluent courtesy of Inter Pipeline Fund, and will be sent elsewhere to be refined or upgraded into high quality crude oil. The blend will initially be sent to Imperial's two Ontario refineries and some to the Strathcona refinery in Edmonton. After 2012, the blend will be sent via pipeline to Exxon refineries in the Gulf Coast and Midwest.
Most workers will be hired for the construction phase of the project. Many folks, including the Alberta Federation of Labour, are concerned the good jobs and money will go south of its border into the United States once construction is finished.
Building an upgrader is an expensive endeavor in Canada and is more than double the cost of building one near the Gulf of Mexico, according to the FP.
That leaves Exxon in a darn good spot. The company's refining capabilities pads its bottom line and its subsidiary avoids the cost of building an upgrader. The only crimp in Exxon's new moneymaking machine might be pending cap-and-trade legislation, which could negatively impact oil sands development.
It's hard to predict whether Imperial's decision marks the beginning of an oil sands revival. This is what I can predict with some confidence: new jobs and additional money will provide a boost to an economy increasingly reliant on the oil sands business. The question is how long-term that boost will be?
Imperial Oil is controlled by Exxon, which holds 70 percent ownership of the Canadian energy company. Imperial, and Exxon as a result, has already benefited to the tune of C$1 billion because it waited to approve the Kearl Lake project. But the real boon for Exxon won't come for a few more years.
Once all phases have been completed, the Kearl Lake project will mine up to 300,000 barrels a day of bitumen, a sticky, low-grade crude oil. The first phase is expected to produce 110,000 barrels, although Imperial Vice President Randy Broiles said expanded capacity could increase output by 27 percent to 140,000 barrels a day.
The bitumen will be mined, combined with a diluent courtesy of Inter Pipeline Fund, and will be sent elsewhere to be refined or upgraded into high quality crude oil. The blend will initially be sent to Imperial's two Ontario refineries and some to the Strathcona refinery in Edmonton. After 2012, the blend will be sent via pipeline to Exxon refineries in the Gulf Coast and Midwest.
Most workers will be hired for the construction phase of the project. Many folks, including the Alberta Federation of Labour, are concerned the good jobs and money will go south of its border into the United States once construction is finished.
Building an upgrader is an expensive endeavor in Canada and is more than double the cost of building one near the Gulf of Mexico, according to the FP.
That leaves Exxon in a darn good spot. The company's refining capabilities pads its bottom line and its subsidiary avoids the cost of building an upgrader. The only crimp in Exxon's new moneymaking machine might be pending cap-and-trade legislation, which could negatively impact oil sands development.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- McCartney to debut new songs live on iTunes stream
- Capello: No plans to coach in Italy
- Redknapp flattered by England coach consideration
- FA chiefs meet to consider Capello's successor
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Timothy Dolan: Birth control tweak a "first step"
on CBS News






