March 27, 2009 11:58 AM
- Text
Chief Designer on "Less-Formal" New Rolls-Royce, the 200EX
(MoneyWatch) Rolls-Royce will introduce a smaller, somewhat less-expensive car next year ?€" smaller and less-expensive by Rolls-Royce standards, that is. Code-named 200EX, the concept car on which the production car will be based was put on display in New York this week for journalists, and for Rolls-Royce customers and prospects.
It will be priced around $250,000 to $280,000, versus the Rolls-Royce Phantom, which ranges from $380,000 to $434,000. Germany's BMW owns Great Britain's Rolls-Royce and re-launched the brand with an all-new lineup, starting in 2003.
BNET Auto Analyst Jim Henry interviewed Rolls-Royce Chief Designer Ian Cameron on March 25. The following are edited excerpts:
BNET: When does this car go on sale? Ian Cameron: In the U.S., probably April 2010.
BNET: Since reviving the brand, the three models you offer so far are all variations on the Phantom. But this is entirely new, right? And built in an entirely different way? IC: It's a completely new car in a completely new segment. This car is unibody (all one piece) whereas the Phantom is a body attached to an aluminum frame. This takes Rolls-Royce to a new audience.
BNET: New, how? Since it's less expensive, I assume that means younger, maybe slightly less affluent? IC: It's not so much to do with age and income. We say that the Phantom stands for formality. For a lot of people, the Phantom is too over the top. For others, that's exactly what they want. For another sort of segment, they want one of each, for another sort of use. Many of our customers have a garage with five or six cars. They use it like a wardrobe, like you would change garments depending on the occasion.
BNET: What about the design makes it less formal? IC: The lines of the car are more dramatic. There is the dramatic wheel size relative to the body height. You've got to be able to recognize it as a Rolls-Royce from every angle.
BNET: What about the grille? IC: It took us 100 years to reach this point, but the grille now looks like an air intake, rather than a Greek temple. There is less rigidity. There are these optional dual tailpipes. This (200EX) is obviously a driver's car.
BNET: You mean, as opposed to chauffeur-driven. Do you expect this car to be chauffeur-driven in some markets? Probably not in this country, but in other markets around the world, like China, which is big on chauffeurs? IC: We find that even the Phantom is usually only chauffeur-driven for events and special occasions. The Far East, the Mid-East, that's something else. But this car, certainly, will be driven by the owner.
BNET: Your competitors at Bentley have made similar comments to what you just said earlier, about the Phantom being too formal. But they also made the point that re-starting the brand, it made sense, especially for Rolls-Royce, to start with the top-end car. IC: They're wrong about that (being too formal), for our customers. But that's right about the brand, you can't set a stage for Rolls-Royce, coming up from below.
It will be priced around $250,000 to $280,000, versus the Rolls-Royce Phantom, which ranges from $380,000 to $434,000. Germany's BMW owns Great Britain's Rolls-Royce and re-launched the brand with an all-new lineup, starting in 2003.BNET Auto Analyst Jim Henry interviewed Rolls-Royce Chief Designer Ian Cameron on March 25. The following are edited excerpts:
BNET: When does this car go on sale? Ian Cameron: In the U.S., probably April 2010.
BNET: Since reviving the brand, the three models you offer so far are all variations on the Phantom. But this is entirely new, right? And built in an entirely different way? IC: It's a completely new car in a completely new segment. This car is unibody (all one piece) whereas the Phantom is a body attached to an aluminum frame. This takes Rolls-Royce to a new audience.
BNET: New, how? Since it's less expensive, I assume that means younger, maybe slightly less affluent? IC: It's not so much to do with age and income. We say that the Phantom stands for formality. For a lot of people, the Phantom is too over the top. For others, that's exactly what they want. For another sort of segment, they want one of each, for another sort of use. Many of our customers have a garage with five or six cars. They use it like a wardrobe, like you would change garments depending on the occasion.
BNET: What about the design makes it less formal? IC: The lines of the car are more dramatic. There is the dramatic wheel size relative to the body height. You've got to be able to recognize it as a Rolls-Royce from every angle.
BNET: What about the grille? IC: It took us 100 years to reach this point, but the grille now looks like an air intake, rather than a Greek temple. There is less rigidity. There are these optional dual tailpipes. This (200EX) is obviously a driver's car.
BNET: You mean, as opposed to chauffeur-driven. Do you expect this car to be chauffeur-driven in some markets? Probably not in this country, but in other markets around the world, like China, which is big on chauffeurs? IC: We find that even the Phantom is usually only chauffeur-driven for events and special occasions. The Far East, the Mid-East, that's something else. But this car, certainly, will be driven by the owner.
BNET: Your competitors at Bentley have made similar comments to what you just said earlier, about the Phantom being too formal. But they also made the point that re-starting the brand, it made sense, especially for Rolls-Royce, to start with the top-end car. IC: They're wrong about that (being too formal), for our customers. But that's right about the brand, you can't set a stage for Rolls-Royce, coming up from below.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Capello: No plans to coach in Italy
- Redknapp flattered by England coach consideration
- FA chiefs meet to consider Capello's successor
- Capello: No plans to coach in Italy
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Timothy Dolan: Birth control tweak a "first step"
on CBS News






