August 15, 2008 6:18 PM
- Text
Psst! New Cadillac SRX Up Our Sleeve
(MoneyWatch)
Another ominous sign for GM, although they don't intend it that way: Cadillac on Aug. 15 provided "sneak preview" photos of next year's replacement for the Cadillac SRX. It would also be a good guess that the new crossover will also replace the Saab 9-7X, an SUV based closely on the Chevy TrailBlazer.
As I've noted a couple times now, you know a car company is really desperate when they start rolling out the future products, as if to say, "Don't judge us on what we've got on the road today. Bear with us, look at all the great stuff we've got coming!"
The new SRX is shorter and looks taller than the current SRX, which has three rows of seats. Cadillac spokesman David Caldwell confirmed that the new SRX has only two rows of seats, and will accommodate five people. Think Lexus RX-fighter.
Judging by the timing, the new SRX will likely make its public debut at the Detroit auto show in January 2009. Sales start in calendar-year 2009 for the 2010 model year, which probably means fall 2009.
And maybe that means GM is only semi-desperate, since fall 2009 isnt that far off. On the other hand, GM has also gotten more generous recently with "sneak peeks" of the final production version of the Chevy Volt, a plug-in hybrid car that's not due until around 2010. The Chevy Volt even makes an appearance in GM ads during the Summer Olympics.
Don't get me wrong, I think it's great when car companies spill their future products. The fear in the auto industry is that showing a new model too soon, and generating a lot of press too soon, kills sales of the existing one. That's not a concern for the Volt, which is all-new. It might not be much of a concern for the SRX, either, since it's already a slow seller.
It's also feared that too much coverage too soon could kill the buzz, when the actual launch comes along. In my opinion, those fears are greatly exaggerated.
It may dull the appetites of us auto writers, if we've seen something 1,000 times before it hits the market. But I don't think our coverage has that much effect on the buying public. To believe that it does, it to give us auto writers more influence than I think we have.
Outside of the auto enthusiast crowd, I think the vast majority of people only pay attention to stories about cars when they're in the market. When they're not in the market, it goes in one ear and out the other.
Another ominous sign for GM, although they don't intend it that way: Cadillac on Aug. 15 provided "sneak preview" photos of next year's replacement for the Cadillac SRX. It would also be a good guess that the new crossover will also replace the Saab 9-7X, an SUV based closely on the Chevy TrailBlazer.As I've noted a couple times now, you know a car company is really desperate when they start rolling out the future products, as if to say, "Don't judge us on what we've got on the road today. Bear with us, look at all the great stuff we've got coming!"
The new SRX is shorter and looks taller than the current SRX, which has three rows of seats. Cadillac spokesman David Caldwell confirmed that the new SRX has only two rows of seats, and will accommodate five people. Think Lexus RX-fighter.
Judging by the timing, the new SRX will likely make its public debut at the Detroit auto show in January 2009. Sales start in calendar-year 2009 for the 2010 model year, which probably means fall 2009.
And maybe that means GM is only semi-desperate, since fall 2009 isnt that far off. On the other hand, GM has also gotten more generous recently with "sneak peeks" of the final production version of the Chevy Volt, a plug-in hybrid car that's not due until around 2010. The Chevy Volt even makes an appearance in GM ads during the Summer Olympics.
Don't get me wrong, I think it's great when car companies spill their future products. The fear in the auto industry is that showing a new model too soon, and generating a lot of press too soon, kills sales of the existing one. That's not a concern for the Volt, which is all-new. It might not be much of a concern for the SRX, either, since it's already a slow seller.
It's also feared that too much coverage too soon could kill the buzz, when the actual launch comes along. In my opinion, those fears are greatly exaggerated.
It may dull the appetites of us auto writers, if we've seen something 1,000 times before it hits the market. But I don't think our coverage has that much effect on the buying public. To believe that it does, it to give us auto writers more influence than I think we have.
Outside of the auto enthusiast crowd, I think the vast majority of people only pay attention to stories about cars when they're in the market. When they're not in the market, it goes in one ear and out the other.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- No charges against NYPD boss' son after rape claim
- Hazing court martial begins for Marine sergeant
- 2 dead, 2 hurt after Texas transit stop shooting
- History expert pleads guilty to stealing documents
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






