May 5, 2008 12:20 PM
- Text
Monthly Auto Sales Data: Read Between the Lines
(MoneyWatch) Watching the sausage being made is never a pretty sight -- in the auto industry, monthly sales numbers are no exception. I should know: I once worked at Mercedes-Benz, where my responsibilities included toting up the data.
For instance, AutoData Corp. reported on May 1 that U.S. light-vehicle sales in April were 1,246,554, down 6.9 percent year-over-year. There's plenty of comment around whether that's bad or good, some of which I wrote (it's bad). But here, I call your attention to the number, "1,246,554." Not 1,246,553, or 1,246,555.
It's absurd to think that anybody knows that precisely, and my friends at AutoData would tell you the same thing. Remember the scene in "I Love Lucy," where Lucy is working on the candy assembly line that keeps getting faster and faster? She can't keep up, and she finally resorts to stuffing the chocolates in her mouth, in her pockets, anywhere before she's completely overwhelmed.
That's what it's like at a car company with sales reports coming in from the dealers. Sure, it's computerized, and digital. But somebody, somewhere in the process has to figuratively cry, "Halt!" and decide to the single digit how many cars the company sold that month.
Having done that, some car companies adjust their sales numbers for "selling days," and some don't. Counting selling days, essentially business days, is a whole other subject. But for the sake of argument, say everybody agrees there were 26 selling days in the month just ended, versus 24 in the year-ago month.
So Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. says its sales went down 4.5 percent in April to 217,700 vehicles, even though it sold 210,457 in the year-ago month. Huh? That's because Toyota reports the change by daily selling rate. That is, 217,700 divided by 26, is less than 210,457 divided by 24. But Ford Motor Co., for instance, reports units versus units, with no adjustment for selling days.
As far as I know, nobody adjusts for whether the extra selling days include a weekend, or legal holidays, but that would skew the numbers, too. And some markets allow Sunday sales, and some don't. And don't get me started on year-ago numbers. Car companies often "restate" their numbers in subsequent months, so you very often find that the "year-ago" number in this year's report doesn't match the number they reported a year ago.
For instance, AutoData Corp. reported on May 1 that U.S. light-vehicle sales in April were 1,246,554, down 6.9 percent year-over-year. There's plenty of comment around whether that's bad or good, some of which I wrote (it's bad). But here, I call your attention to the number, "1,246,554." Not 1,246,553, or 1,246,555.
It's absurd to think that anybody knows that precisely, and my friends at AutoData would tell you the same thing. Remember the scene in "I Love Lucy," where Lucy is working on the candy assembly line that keeps getting faster and faster? She can't keep up, and she finally resorts to stuffing the chocolates in her mouth, in her pockets, anywhere before she's completely overwhelmed.
That's what it's like at a car company with sales reports coming in from the dealers. Sure, it's computerized, and digital. But somebody, somewhere in the process has to figuratively cry, "Halt!" and decide to the single digit how many cars the company sold that month.
Having done that, some car companies adjust their sales numbers for "selling days," and some don't. Counting selling days, essentially business days, is a whole other subject. But for the sake of argument, say everybody agrees there were 26 selling days in the month just ended, versus 24 in the year-ago month.
So Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. says its sales went down 4.5 percent in April to 217,700 vehicles, even though it sold 210,457 in the year-ago month. Huh? That's because Toyota reports the change by daily selling rate. That is, 217,700 divided by 26, is less than 210,457 divided by 24. But Ford Motor Co., for instance, reports units versus units, with no adjustment for selling days.
As far as I know, nobody adjusts for whether the extra selling days include a weekend, or legal holidays, but that would skew the numbers, too. And some markets allow Sunday sales, and some don't. And don't get me started on year-ago numbers. Car companies often "restate" their numbers in subsequent months, so you very often find that the "year-ago" number in this year's report doesn't match the number they reported a year ago.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- House bill delays rail safety mandate
- Canadian family members rescued from Pacific ocean
- Attorney: Reagan shooter Hinckley not dangerous
- Canadian family members rescued from Pacific ocean
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






