July 27, 2010 5:43 PM
- Text
Drug Company as Masochist: Bristol-Myers Takes Needless Whipping for HIV Drug Prices
(MoneyWatch)
Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) is again needlessly taking a beating over the price of its AIDS drugs. The AIDS Healthcare Foundation criticized BMS for not agreeing to supply cut-price HIV drugs to state programs that care for unemployed AIDS patients, but the flap may say more about BMS's corporate masochism than its actual intransigence over AIDS drug pricing.
Remember, it was BMS that suffered pointlessly in silence when it was mostly falsely accused of trying to kill 7,000 babies by withdrawing their HIV treatments in June. This, again, is a reminder that staying silent is often a bad strategy in the face of criticism, because the group that's actually negotiating to get those AIDS drug discounts doesn't have much of a beef with BMS.
In a chat with BNET, Beth Krutsinger-Perry, the associate director of care and treatment at the National Alliance of State & Territorial AIDS Directors, said that the states already have an agreement with BMS to supply the antiretroviral therapy Reyataz at a discount, and that they're in talks with BMS to cut the price further. "We're confident they'll come back to us with something," she says. (Apparently, BMS's problem is that the people doing the negotiating don't actually have permission to make a deal, and must keep going back to their bosses at BMS for decisions -- another example of BMS's self-harming culture). NASTAD's talks with BMS were mentioned in a July 8 press release.
NASTAD's current pricing agreement with BMS dates back to about October 2009. The reason the state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs want more price cuts is because the recession has created a record number of unemployed HIV patients --- 2,158 at the last count -- without healthcare coverage who are on waiting lists for HIV treatment.
While the AHF accuses BMS in its press release of raising the price of Reyataz by 25 percent to an average wholesale price of Reyataz $13,046 per year, the AHF doesn't actually know what BMS charges the states under its current discount arrangement, nor does it know the dollar size of the further cuts currently being negotiated. A source tells BNET -- and NASTAD's Krutsinger-Perry confirmed -- that negotiations with all companies only take place on the condition that the actual discounts are kept secret. AHF president Michael Weinstein told BNET that he believes BMS currently supplies ADAPs with Reyataz priced at about $8,000, far lower than the amount cited in his press release.
Lastly, in the same press release, AHF lauds Abbott Labs (ABT) for being one of the companies that has reached an agreement to discount its HIV drugs. That's strange praise indeed, for AHF knows full well that Abbott controls a legal monopoly on Norvir, the protease inhibitor that must be taken with BMS's Reyataz and other HIV drugs, and that Abbott has jacked up the price of Norvir by more than 500 percent for everyone else who needs it. AHF, in fact, once sued Abbott over its Norvir pricing.
Related:
Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) is again needlessly taking a beating over the price of its AIDS drugs. The AIDS Healthcare Foundation criticized BMS for not agreeing to supply cut-price HIV drugs to state programs that care for unemployed AIDS patients, but the flap may say more about BMS's corporate masochism than its actual intransigence over AIDS drug pricing.Remember, it was BMS that suffered pointlessly in silence when it was mostly falsely accused of trying to kill 7,000 babies by withdrawing their HIV treatments in June. This, again, is a reminder that staying silent is often a bad strategy in the face of criticism, because the group that's actually negotiating to get those AIDS drug discounts doesn't have much of a beef with BMS.
In a chat with BNET, Beth Krutsinger-Perry, the associate director of care and treatment at the National Alliance of State & Territorial AIDS Directors, said that the states already have an agreement with BMS to supply the antiretroviral therapy Reyataz at a discount, and that they're in talks with BMS to cut the price further. "We're confident they'll come back to us with something," she says. (Apparently, BMS's problem is that the people doing the negotiating don't actually have permission to make a deal, and must keep going back to their bosses at BMS for decisions -- another example of BMS's self-harming culture). NASTAD's talks with BMS were mentioned in a July 8 press release.
NASTAD's current pricing agreement with BMS dates back to about October 2009. The reason the state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs want more price cuts is because the recession has created a record number of unemployed HIV patients --- 2,158 at the last count -- without healthcare coverage who are on waiting lists for HIV treatment.
While the AHF accuses BMS in its press release of raising the price of Reyataz by 25 percent to an average wholesale price of Reyataz $13,046 per year, the AHF doesn't actually know what BMS charges the states under its current discount arrangement, nor does it know the dollar size of the further cuts currently being negotiated. A source tells BNET -- and NASTAD's Krutsinger-Perry confirmed -- that negotiations with all companies only take place on the condition that the actual discounts are kept secret. AHF president Michael Weinstein told BNET that he believes BMS currently supplies ADAPs with Reyataz priced at about $8,000, far lower than the amount cited in his press release.
Lastly, in the same press release, AHF lauds Abbott Labs (ABT) for being one of the companies that has reached an agreement to discount its HIV drugs. That's strange praise indeed, for AHF knows full well that Abbott controls a legal monopoly on Norvir, the protease inhibitor that must be taken with BMS's Reyataz and other HIV drugs, and that Abbott has jacked up the price of Norvir by more than 500 percent for everyone else who needs it. AHF, in fact, once sued Abbott over its Norvir pricing.
Related:
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Hamas strongman in Gaza rejects unity deal
- Houston recalled as happy in days before death
- Pre-Grammy gala celebrates Whitney Houston's life
- The nation's weather
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Remembering Whitney Houston 1963-2012
on CBS News






