September 14, 2009 9:28 PM
- Text
Why Vivus's Qnexa Might Not Avoid the Obesity Drug Graveyard
(MoneyWatch) Many have tried. None have succeeded. And now Vivus -- a young Arthur of Pharmalot, if you will -- believes it can pull the sword from the stone. On paper, it has a good case. My colleague Trista Morrison makes that case cogently here.
Put simply, Qnexa has twice blown through the FDA's required "5 percent better than placebo" weight-loss standard. And if this press release is to be believed, there are no significant safety problems.
What could possibly go wrong? Three things:
Image by Flickr user Qole Pejorian, CC.
Put simply, Qnexa has twice blown through the FDA's required "5 percent better than placebo" weight-loss standard. And if this press release is to be believed, there are no significant safety problems.What could possibly go wrong? Three things:
- History: The history of diet drugs is simple to understand. They either don't work, are dangerous, or are effective but so unpleasant that -- like GlaxoSmithKline's Alli -- few can stand to use them. So on the track record alone, if you think Qnexa is $10 billion-a-year drug, you're betting against history.
- Qnexa is a speed-based antidepressant: This drug is literally a mixture of the amphetamine phentermine and the epilepsy/antidepressant drug topiramate (Topamax). And while Vivus's testing has not turned up any major side effect signals, the Qnexa proposition essentially asks doctors to prescribe the drug to patients who are neither depressed nor epileptic nor fatigued. Is it likely that widespread use of such a mixture will lead to zero worrying side-effect signals?
- Qnexa is too effective: Remember, to succeed it is not good enough to simply be effective. Wyeth's infamous Fen-Phen was effective. Cocaine and cigarettes are effective. It's just that extended use of these products results in death. In Vivus's most recent test, patients lost up to 13.2 percent of their body weight. That's fine if you weigh more than 250 pounds, as the patients in the test did. But it's ruinously unhealthy if you weigh around 120 pounds or less. Thus, the FDA may ban it for patients who aren't fantastically heavy -- and that could restrict its revenues.
Image by Flickr user Qole Pejorian, CC.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Egypt's PM says US threats to cut aid won't work
- 2 Venezuelans to court for posing kids with guns
- Haiti 'Baby Doc' case spurs claim of gov't sway
- Haiti 'Baby Doc' case spurs claim of gov't sway
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






