April 10, 2009 2:57 PM
- Text
7,000 Retailers Strike Against Novartis, Sandoz
(MoneyWatch) Only in India: 7,000 drug retailers have refused to carry products from Novartis and its generic unit Sandoz because the company sells drugs direct to consumers at the same price as the retailers do, according to The Economic Times. By doing so, the companies keep the profit margin that's built in for retailers. The retailers have refused to handle any of the 198 drugs the two companies make. They say the pair are violating a drug price control order that gives those margins to the retailers.
The context of the fight raises an interesting geopolitical question: How far along is India in its quest to change itself from a backward, corrupt Third World tourist stop into a modern economic powerhouse of the East? In this case, the specific issue is the state of India's refrigeration infrastructure.
The companies argue that the direct sales were established for patients who need specialty drugs that need careful handling, such as constant refrigeration. The retailers claim they already have that and other companies haven't complained: The ET:
The context of the fight raises an interesting geopolitical question: How far along is India in its quest to change itself from a backward, corrupt Third World tourist stop into a modern economic powerhouse of the East? In this case, the specific issue is the state of India's refrigeration infrastructure.
The companies argue that the direct sales were established for patients who need specialty drugs that need careful handling, such as constant refrigeration. The retailers claim they already have that and other companies haven't complained: The ET:
A Novartis spokeswoman said ... Such products are required to be stored under special conditions, including air-conditioning for 24 hours, refrigeration at specific temperatures and continuous maintenance of automated temperature logs," she said, adding the abuse of these conditions could reduce the efficacy of the life-saving drugs, thus harming patients.
She said, in India, the cold chain supply infrastructure still has a long way to go before it meets international standards, therefore the boycott is unwarranted at this point of time. "In fact, the boycott goes against the interest of the patients as critical drugs will go off the shelves," she said.
But the retailers have refuted this claim by saying that they are selling similar niche drugs of other companies and its stores meet all the technical requirements to sell such products.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
- Venezuelans: Will Chavez's challenger pose threat?
- Malaysia to deport Saudi accused of prophet insult
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






