January 23, 2009 2:33 PM
- Text
Vioxx Settlement: Lawyers, Patients and Insurers Scrap Over Slices of $4.8 Billion Pie
(MoneyWatch) With the $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement with Merck safely in hand, now the squabbling has begun over who, exactly, is going to receive that money: the patients who were hurt, the insurance companies who paid for the faulty drug, or the lawyers who engineered the jackpot deal?
The Louisiana federal court had capped lawyers' fees at 32 percent of the deal. But that was less than what the plaintiff-patients and their counsel had agreed to, and so the lawyers have gone back to court to say, "Hey, we had a deal with our clients here. You can't override it with your fancy rulings!"
Separately, in apparent proof that not all lawyers are completely evil, the lawyers, led by Seeger Weiss's Christopher Seeger, have persuaded the insurance companies to reduce the size of the liens they had placed on patients involved in the litigation. (The insurance companies, seeing a boat load of cash appear on the horizon in the form of the settlement, immediately dunned the patients who earned it for reimbursement of the medical bills. God bless American healthcare!)
The lien-reduction deal applies to 100 insurance companies and, according to Seeger, will increase the total from the settlement that actually goes to patients.
You can see how these two events seem to dovetail neatly. On the one hand the lawyers have persuaded the insurers to reduce their slice of the pie. On the other, they're grasping for a bigger slice for themselves. Image by Flickr user net efekt, CC.
The Louisiana federal court had capped lawyers' fees at 32 percent of the deal. But that was less than what the plaintiff-patients and their counsel had agreed to, and so the lawyers have gone back to court to say, "Hey, we had a deal with our clients here. You can't override it with your fancy rulings!"Separately, in apparent proof that not all lawyers are completely evil, the lawyers, led by Seeger Weiss's Christopher Seeger, have persuaded the insurance companies to reduce the size of the liens they had placed on patients involved in the litigation. (The insurance companies, seeing a boat load of cash appear on the horizon in the form of the settlement, immediately dunned the patients who earned it for reimbursement of the medical bills. God bless American healthcare!)
The lien-reduction deal applies to 100 insurance companies and, according to Seeger, will increase the total from the settlement that actually goes to patients.
You can see how these two events seem to dovetail neatly. On the one hand the lawyers have persuaded the insurers to reduce their slice of the pie. On the other, they're grasping for a bigger slice for themselves. Image by Flickr user net efekt, CC.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- France's far-right leader attempts image change
- Hamas strongman in Gaza rejects unity deal
- Houston recalled as happy in days before death
- Pre-Grammy gala celebrates Whitney Houston's life
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Remembering Whitney Houston 1963-2012
on CBS News






