May 14, 2010 12:15 PM
- Text
New Logo for Seattle's Best Coffee Meets With Hail of Jeers
(MoneyWatch)
One of the toughest things a company can do is introduce a new corporate logo, and Seattle's Best Coffee, a unit of Starbucks (SBUX), is finding that out this week as its new brand was greeted with a hail of jeers. Designers say it looks like a blood bank logo; The Seattle Weekly said, "It's basically what you'd get if you combined Target with the Red Cross." An online poll shows 69 percent don't like the change.
Logos have a strange power: When Pepsico tried to change Tropicana's packaging, consumers mutinied and the company was forced to change it back. Managers often want to change their logo because they want to "refresh" their brand or give themselves a new story to tell consumers. It's often a mistake: logos are one of the few parts of a company that rarely change. Advertising, products and store locations can all morph from week to week. So consumers sometimes develop a greater familiarity with the logo than anything else about a company. And, of course, the logo is "consumed" by many more consumers than actually buy the product. In short, changing the logo is marketing's third rail: Touch it at your peril.
The problem with SBC's new marque is that it's a product of its times: It has the clean, modern lines of, well, pretty much everything, from Apple to Pepsi. And "clean" and "modern" don't say "coffee." The old logo had a vintage appeal (even though the company is only 40 years old); it suggested the coffee came from one of those aroma-packed mom-and-pop coffee stores where beans sit in sacks on the floor and grounds are measured on a brass scale.
That's the coffee experience most people want, even if they're actually getting a paper cup in a movie theater.
The new logo evokes none of that. Because it's so trendy, it looks like it could be any corporate letterhead, from Lukoil to Vodafone.
Still, the true test is time. Everyone laughed at the new Pepsi redesign, but a year or so later it's fair to say that it's an improvement on the old one, which in hindsight reeked of the 1980s.
Related:
One of the toughest things a company can do is introduce a new corporate logo, and Seattle's Best Coffee, a unit of Starbucks (SBUX), is finding that out this week as its new brand was greeted with a hail of jeers. Designers say it looks like a blood bank logo; The Seattle Weekly said, "It's basically what you'd get if you combined Target with the Red Cross." An online poll shows 69 percent don't like the change.Logos have a strange power: When Pepsico tried to change Tropicana's packaging, consumers mutinied and the company was forced to change it back. Managers often want to change their logo because they want to "refresh" their brand or give themselves a new story to tell consumers. It's often a mistake: logos are one of the few parts of a company that rarely change. Advertising, products and store locations can all morph from week to week. So consumers sometimes develop a greater familiarity with the logo than anything else about a company. And, of course, the logo is "consumed" by many more consumers than actually buy the product. In short, changing the logo is marketing's third rail: Touch it at your peril.
The problem with SBC's new marque is that it's a product of its times: It has the clean, modern lines of, well, pretty much everything, from Apple to Pepsi. And "clean" and "modern" don't say "coffee." The old logo had a vintage appeal (even though the company is only 40 years old); it suggested the coffee came from one of those aroma-packed mom-and-pop coffee stores where beans sit in sacks on the floor and grounds are measured on a brass scale.
That's the coffee experience most people want, even if they're actually getting a paper cup in a movie theater.
The new logo evokes none of that. Because it's so trendy, it looks like it could be any corporate letterhead, from Lukoil to Vodafone.Still, the true test is time. Everyone laughed at the new Pepsi redesign, but a year or so later it's fair to say that it's an improvement on the old one, which in hindsight reeked of the 1980s.
Related:
- New Jack in the Box Logo: Is It Any Good?
- Arnell's "Explanation" of Failed Tropicana Design Resembles His Nonsensical Pepsi Document
- Pepsi's Nonsensical Logo Redesign Document: $1 Million for This?
- New Pepsi Logo Seems Similar to Three Other Corporate Emblems
- Pepsi's New $1 Million Logo Looks Like Old Diet Pepsi Logo
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
- Wholesale inventories rose 1 percent in December
- States, Feds to announce new mortgage settlement
- Management changes at Ford
- Unemployment aid applications near a 4-year low
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Group 1 Auto 4th-quarter profit nearly doubles
- What's left at Kodak after digital camera exit
- Man pleads guilty over online 'South Park' threat
- AG: Mass. to get $318M from foreclosure settlement
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "American Idol": Jim Carrey's daughter out, and then disaster
on CBS News






