October 9, 2009 4:02 PM
- Text
Experiment Suggests Evidence for Subliminal Advertising
(MoneyWatch)
Subliminal advertising really does work, The Telegraph (wrongly) concludes after reporting on a University College London experiment in which words were briefly flashed on a computer screen and subjects, who did not have time to read them, were asked to categorize them as positive or negative.
They judged the negative words (agony, despair, murder, etc) correctly 66 percent of the time, but the positive ones were identified correctly only 50 percent of the time -- as bad as pure chance.
As the BBC pointed out, the experiment does not reflect real life. Subliminal advertising has long been banned in the U.S. and Europe even though there is scant evidence that showing people imperceptibly brief messages has any affect on their behavior.
A much more interesting experiment was done by Prof. Gavan Fitzsimons of Duke University, who showed that when people were subliminally exposed to the Apple logo, they performed more "creatively" in tasks than those exposed to the IBM logo. Similarly, the Disney logo made people respond more honestly to a questionnaire than the E! Channel logo.
And finally: Brands really do "live" in different neural circuits in the brain, if this unscientific test -- in which your author was inserted into an fMRI while being exposed to different brands -- is any guide.
Subliminal advertising really does work, The Telegraph (wrongly) concludes after reporting on a University College London experiment in which words were briefly flashed on a computer screen and subjects, who did not have time to read them, were asked to categorize them as positive or negative.They judged the negative words (agony, despair, murder, etc) correctly 66 percent of the time, but the positive ones were identified correctly only 50 percent of the time -- as bad as pure chance.
As the BBC pointed out, the experiment does not reflect real life. Subliminal advertising has long been banned in the U.S. and Europe even though there is scant evidence that showing people imperceptibly brief messages has any affect on their behavior.
A much more interesting experiment was done by Prof. Gavan Fitzsimons of Duke University, who showed that when people were subliminally exposed to the Apple logo, they performed more "creatively" in tasks than those exposed to the IBM logo. Similarly, the Disney logo made people respond more honestly to a questionnaire than the E! Channel logo.And finally: Brands really do "live" in different neural circuits in the brain, if this unscientific test -- in which your author was inserted into an fMRI while being exposed to different brands -- is any guide.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Ahmadinejad seeks rebound in Iranian elections
- EU plans Syria sanctions as regime assaults Homs
- Egypt's PM says US threats to cut aid won't work
- 2 Venezuelans to court for posing kids with guns
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






