January 23, 2009 1:30 PM
- Text
IPG's Geier Has Bizarre Economic Stimulus Idea; Blows Thousands on Ad in the Times
(MoneyWatch) Today's news of layoffs at Dentsu and InterPublic's McCann is depressing, but not helping matters is former IPG titan Phil Geier, who took out a full-page ad in the New York Times with his own money to tout a ludicrous economic stimulus idea. His notion, per Ad Age, is that President Obama should give every American:
Second, as the New Yorker's James Surowiecki explained this week, there's a reason all-at-once giveaways don't stimulate the economy (think of Bush's 2001 rebates). Give people a lump sum and they save it, expecting the worst. Give people a repeated chain of smaller sums and they treat it as "permanent" income, spending it on bills and stuff, thus boosting the economy.
Third, Phil, it's nice that you're rich enough to afford full-page ads in the Times with your own money. The price of those things runs $65,000 to $181,000. (And lord know the Times needs the money.) But your former staffers are joining the unemployment lines. So perhaps you should enjoy your wealth more discreetly. Just a thought.
IPG employees will remember that Geier's track record on matters economic isn't great. Hands up if you remember when IPG was forced to give back $250 million that it "accidentally" diverted from its clients? Phil, the government already has "checks" that can be exchanged for goods. It's called "money." The difference between "money" and "checks" is that money is free to process, whereas checks create a wealth-destroying processing/clearance fee. So your "checks" idea is wasting money before it's even printed.a book of checks [that] may be used for discounts against certain purchases including cars, computers, household appliances, restaurant meals and grocery store items. Alternately, they could be combined for a large purchase or a lease or down-payment commitment.
Second, as the New Yorker's James Surowiecki explained this week, there's a reason all-at-once giveaways don't stimulate the economy (think of Bush's 2001 rebates). Give people a lump sum and they save it, expecting the worst. Give people a repeated chain of smaller sums and they treat it as "permanent" income, spending it on bills and stuff, thus boosting the economy.
Third, Phil, it's nice that you're rich enough to afford full-page ads in the Times with your own money. The price of those things runs $65,000 to $181,000. (And lord know the Times needs the money.) But your former staffers are joining the unemployment lines. So perhaps you should enjoy your wealth more discreetly. Just a thought.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- France's far-right leader attempts image change
- Hamas strongman in Gaza rejects unity deal
- Houston recalled as happy in days before death
- Pre-Grammy gala celebrates Whitney Houston's life
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Remembering Whitney Houston 1963-2012
on CBS News







